Construction Work Recommences At Limbe Shipyard

Construction work, which had practically been halted at the Limbe Shipyard site, has recommenced.

On Wednesday, March 6, the Minister of Transport, Professor Robert Nkili, was at the site for a brief visit to enable him assess what is currently going on since work on a quay wall began over a month ago. Nkili was received by the Task Force Manager for the site, Beck Baye, who led him round the site in the company of other top officials of the Cameroon Shipyard and Industrial Engineering Company Limited, (Chantier Naval).

At the landward end of the shipyard, bulldozers could be seen leveling the area while trucks ferried away loads of soils. Meantime, at another end, workers in helmets and overalls tinkered away with their tools doing all sorts of engineering work. The construction of the quay wall is being carried out by BAM International, a Dutch company, valued at some 29 million Euros (approximately FCFA 19.022 billion).

The work is expected to be completed by May, 2014. The quay wall will be some 320 metres long with an underwater concrete foundation. In 2007, Interbeton concluded the construction of a 700-meter long break water wall stretching deep into the sea. It was the first major construction works at the shipyard to shield the yard from strong waves where oil rigs could dock and undergo repairs.

The breakwater had been long concluded but the change of command at the helm of Chantier Naval in 2008 where Zaccheus Forjindam was replaced by Antoine Bikoro Alo’o led to one crisis after the other and work on the over FCFA 100-billion project slowed down to a near full stop. Baye Beck told the Minister that there were presently some 81 workers at the site with about eight expatriates to carry on with the quay wall construction. Meantime, Nkili, who began his Southwest visit in Tiko with a stop at the Tiko Port also visited the age-old Tiko Airstrip.

He is said to have noted with dissatisfaction the high level of encroachment on the airport land by people who have built on it. The Minister also visited the Idenau Port on that same Wednesday. On Thursday, he visited the Presbyterian Printing Press which does some major printing work for the Ministry of Transport. He also stopped at the Fako Divisional Delegation of Transport at Down Beach.

His trip in Limbe ended at the Delegation of the Merchant Marine Services where he was presented a plethora of problems plaguing this service. “When you look at those old speedboats there, each time my elements go to the high seas it is as if they are going on a suicide mission,” Jonathan Jikong told the Minister. The merchant marines are supposed to provide maritime security to those who do business by sea as well as carry out checks on the high seas to curb smuggling.

But Jikong told the Minister that his service was almost paralyzed owing to the sheer lack of the necessary equipment to do their work. He told the Minister that they don’t even have an office and are presently being housed in an office at the Down Beach area which he said floods whenever it rains heavily.  Jikong added that they don’t even have a satellite communication network to link up with their elements when they drift far into the high seas.

In addition to the lack of speedboats, no communication links, Jikong said they were more or less left at the mercy of sea pirates. “That is why on most occasions we have to request assistance from the military before we go out,” he said. Minister Nkili instantly invited Jikong to meet him in Yaounde for further discussions.

Source: CPO

In Cameroon, anti-gay voices grow louder.

In Cameroon, the topic of homosexuality is no longer taboo. Both in Yaoundé and Douala, on the street, in taxis, restaurants, bars, offices and markets, on the radio and on television, it is difficult to spend a day or even an hour without the conversation reverting to this topic.

Opposition to homosexuality has become the focus of increasingly frequent conferences, panel discussions, sermons, religious campaigns, and interviews with politicians, bishops and other religious leaders in Cameroon, especially in the Cameroon Tribune, the government’s bilingual daily newspaper.

President Paul Biya suggests that people in Cameroon may be changing their minds about homosexuality, but the most obvious change is the frequency of discussions of the issue.

Increasingly, the issue of homosexuality comes up in day-to-day conversations. Most people agree: “With as much energy has we can muster, in the harshest terms possible, we must condemn this behavior, which is so harmful for Cameroon and its youth.”

Almost everyone “firmly” rejects the practice of homosexuality and its supposed corollaries, pederasty and prostitution, which together are called “deviance,” “moral decadence,” “true aberrations,” “amoral,” “unacceptable,” “satanic,” etc.

Conversations are fueled by the topic of homosexuality at home, in churches and in the press.

Consider how the Cameroon Tribune responded to the Amnesty International’s Jan. 24 report on human rights in Cameroon, which urged the repeal of Cameroonian laws against homosexuality and the release of LGBT prisoners.

For Amnesty International, those actions are a matter of human rights. But many in Cameroon see the issue differently.

Yves Atanga, the Tribune’s editor-in-chief, wrote a front-page article titled “Human rights in Cameroon: Amnesty’s false accusations. (Droits de l’homme au Cameroun: Le faux procès d’Amnesty).”

Editorial writer Makon ma Pondi wrote a column titled “Diversion: An anthem for homosexuals.” They took a stand against Amnesty International, calling it “an advocate of homosexuality” and a “finger-wagger,” and especially against homosexuality, “forbidden by Cameroonian laws.”

In his article, Atanga suggested that “in all honesty,” Amnesty should have entitled its report “Cameroon, leave the gays alone!” Pondi’s column complained about an “insidious and relentless campaign orchestrated for months through the media, seeking the repeal of the law [prohibiting sexual relations between persons of the same sex], to be achieved by any means necessary, including diplomatic pressure or withholding foreign aid.” The column asks, “Are we to believe that if we allow homosexuality and same-sex marriage we will achieve the economic growth we seek?”

Bishops say no, no, no!

Bishops of the Roman Catholic Church united in their opposition to homosexuality on Jan. 12 at the 36th annual gathering in Sangmelima of the National Episcopal Conference of Cameroon. In a statement published in its entirety on Feb. 7 in the Cameroon Tribune and later in other newspapers, they denounced homosexuality in strong terms.

They opposed “the multifaceted claims of human rights made by promoters of homosexuality — the right to marriage, to adopt children. to establish a family, to procreation with medical assistance, etc. — claims that are based on several concepts whose main ideology of gender … is opposed to classical ideas of family, gender and reproductive health.”

The bishops ignored examples of traditional African acceptance of same-sex relations. (See, for example, the article “What traditional African homosexuality learned from the West.”)

The bishops unanimously declared that homosexuality “falsifies human anthropology and trivializes sexuality, marriage and family as the foundation of society. In African culture, it is not part of the family and social values. It is a flagrant violation of the legacy left to use by our ancestors, who were faithful to heterosexuality and the family. In human history, homosexual practices have never led to societal evolution but have always been clear signs of civilization’s decay. In fact, homosexuality opposes humanity and destroys it.”

They urged “all believers and people of good will to reject homosexuality and so-called ‘gay marriage’ to pray for homosexuals and those who are inclined toward homosexuality, watching over them and seeking compassionately to convert them.”

Even before their statement was published, Mgr. Victor Tonye Bakot, the archbishop of Yaoundé and a fervent fighter against homosexuality, said in a Jan. 28 interview: “We do not want” homosexuality in Africa.

“The West has its culture and Africans have ours,” he said. “Since we must respect the parallels between the two cultures, and since we are in dialogue with each other, let us propose polygamy to the West just as they propose homosexuality to us. Otherwise, let each of us remain set in their own culture.”

“I reject this new attempt at colonialization. They’re going too far,” he said.

On Feb. 24, the Association of Catholic Jurists of Cameroon condemned homosexuality during a meeting in Douala with Samuel Kléda, archbishop of Douala.

Unnatural?

Although homosexual behavior has been observed in hundreds of species of animals, many people in Cameroon believe otherwise.

For example, in Archbishop Bakot’s sermons in the cathedral in Yaoundé and elsewhere, he condemned homosexuality as an “unnatural practice.”

In addition, attorney Pierre Robert Fojou told journalist Armand Essogo “not only is homosexuality punishable under Article 347 of the Cameroonian Penal Code, but it is also rejected by Cameroonians in general who, as good Africans, consider sexual relations between persons of the same sex against nature. “

Nico Halle preaching to the governor

“This is not negotiable,” stated the Christian Men’s Fellowship of the Presbyterian Church in Cameroon, as it launched a February campaign against homosexuality in the southwestern part of the country. “God made man and woman; animals, he made male and female. It is unacceptable that a man fall in love with another man, which is worse than animals, because animals only make love with the opposite sex. I’ve never seen a hen have sex with another hen, or two female dogs, or two male dogs. The rooster goes with the chicken, and so on. So, if the man will do what even the animal does not, then man becomes worse than an animal. … It is satanic,” reported the newspaper La Nouvelle Expression in an article on Feb. 27 headlined “Southwest: Crusade against homosexuality.”

Tumfor Nico Halle, a lawyer who is president of the Christian Men’s Fellowship of Cameroon, argued that “not only does our penal code condemn homosexuality with Article 347 providing for imprisonment of up to five years, but the Bible is also even harder on it. Leviticus 20 verse 13 says that if a man lie with a man as one lies with a woman, it is an abomination. They shall surely be put to death: their blood will be on them.”

Bernard Okalia Bilai, governor of the Southwest region, agreed with those statements, adding that “as a practicing Christian, he would not allow homosexuality in his region by any means.”

He accused human rights attorney Alice Nkom not only of repeatedly supporting the “homosexual cause” but also of being corrupt. He claimed that, when he was a prefect in Wouri, she urged him to release a homosexual defendant, saying that “a lot of euros are at stake.” Nkom has not yet responded to a request for comment on this accusation.

Rejection of ‘anus-ocracy’

Similar discussions fill the air waves. All day long the radio hosts of FM Yaoundé and their listeners decry the “immorality” of homosexuality. Cameroon Radio and Television (CRTV), the national public television channel, focuses on the subject through debates, documentaries, short films (sometimes made by Cameroonians and other Africans who “reject this practice from the West”) and even in entertainment programs.

The best known of these programs is undoubtedly the show “Delire,” in which the now-graying master of ceremonies, Foly Dirane (the stage name of Adrian Tafen Veyreton), has not let a single show go by in over 20 years without warning youths aged 10 to 25 to watch out for homosexuals.

He boasts that in his 2001 song “Les Mouches,” he became the first singer to denounce homosexuality.

Although many LGBT people in Cameroon live in poverty — fired from their jobs and rejected by their families when their sexual preference becomes known — a widespread belief persists in Cameroon that homosexuals are rich, powerful and evil, even practicing black magic.

Foly Dirane claims that homosexuals are “sectarian pederasts who use money and employment as a bait to lure youths into their traps. By sodomizing their victims, they steal the youths’ power and good fortune,” he says.

“Homosexuality in Cameroon is not like homosexuality in Europe,” he says.

In Cameroon, homosexuals seek to impose an “anus-ocracy,” he says. “Homosexuality is a cult of pederasts who feed on youth.”

This cult’s sorcerers demand homosexuality as a condition sine qua non for young people to succeed in society, he says.

“The cult has chosen homosexuality as a means of domination,” he says. “This sect has money and power and wants to force all young Cameroonians to join them.”

“People without power are propelled into positions of great responsibility through their anus,” he claims.

With statements like those, it’s clear that the “debate” about homosexuality in Cameroon is far from over.

Source: 76Crimes

 

Prime Minister Philemon Yang Wants Insurance Coverage Extended To Underprivileged

If insurance companies hearken to the request of Prime Minister Philemon Yang, insurance coverage will no longer be only for the well-to-do. On February 25, the Prime Minister urged heads of insurance companies in Africa and experts from related organisations to pay greater attention to vulnerable people.

Yang made the request in Yaounde while chairing the 37th Annual General Assembly meeting of Federation of Insurance Companies in Africa, FANAF. The meeting, attended by some 600 delegates from 43 countries, was organised under the theme “Insurance and Social Risks”. He talked about measures by Cameroon to respond to disasters and accidents; prevention and sensitization on insurance.

Meanwhile, the President of FANAF, Protais Ayangma, said focus was on social risks and compensations in the sector such as health for all, accidents and compensation.

“Each time we meet, we challenge members to do well to pay claims of victims, which is our major role,” he said. He highlighted the role of the Conference of Inter- African Insurance Markets (CIMA), which is empowered to withdraw licenses from unprofessional insurance companies.

Ayangma said they intend to market the insurance sector and assure the public that insurance companies should be trusted in handling issues relating to risks. The President of the Insurance Association of Cameroon, Martin Foncha, said Cameroon was no longer satisfied with the second position it occupied in the insurance market within the area covered by CIMA. He said their target is to grab the first position from Ivory Coast.

For four days, insurance experts exchanged ideas on the challenges and opportunities for the development of an enterprise in Africa, the evolution of investment in Africa, societal responsibilities of insurance companies, coverage of natural disasters and mechanisms for the universal medical coverage. In Cameroon, medical insurance remains a luxury, as only few enterprises offer this benefit to their employees. Statistics from the Ministry Public Health show that malaria alone grabs 40 percent of the family income of Cameroonians.

During the FANAF gathering all member countries expressed the same experience, justifying why participants centered discussions on the vital role that health insurance could play in the social protection of Africans. The Federation’s President, Ayangma recommended a public- private partnership in the member countries of FANAF in order to enhance a universal medical insurance.

He called on participants to draw inspiration from Tunisia and Rwanda, which according to him have succeeded to protect their populations through this policy. Ayangma also hinted that plans were underway to implement the automobile guarantee fund in member countries to optimize and accelerate procedures put in place for road accident victims.

Source: CPO

 

UPC Leaders Arrested For Protesting Against ELECAM

Gendarmes February 26, at Rond Point Deido, Douala, broke up a peaceful demonstration by the UPC Mack-Kit against ELECAM and arrested its President and Secretary General.

The gendarmes, who claimed that the protest demonstration was illegal, arrested the President of UPC Mack-Kit, Alexis Same Ndema. But the leadership of the UPC faction insisted that the protest demonstration was not illegal. They explained that the party duly deposited a declaration to organise the peaceful demonstration with the DO of Douala I, Jean-Marie Mbarga Ekoa.

They presented a copy of the declaration to the gendarmes. They also quoted the DO to have cautioned them to ensure that the demonstration took place peacefully. But the gendarmes would not let go the two senior officials of the party and whisked them off into detention at the Bonanjo Gendarmerie Brigade, which is now located in the former office of the defunct REGIFERCAM at the entrance to Bonanjo.

When The Post contacted the National Secretary for Communication of UPC Mack-Kit, Hilaire Ham Ekoue, at 8.30 am on February 27, he said the National President and Secretary General were still in detention. UPC Mack-Kit staged the protest demonstration close to a stand that had been set up by ELECAM at Rond Point Deido to facilitate voter registration. Some of the militants carried placards, while some were busy distributing tracts containing a six-point demand by the party.

The demonstrators denounced ELECAM for not being an independent body. They said that ELECAM is at the service of the ruling CPDM, insisting that Cameroon needs an Independent Electoral Commission to be able to conduct transparent, free and fair elections. The UPC Mack-Kit militants also strongly criticised ELECAM for not having as yet distributed voters’ cards to Cameroonians who had since registered. They saw the long delay as another manipulation by ELECAM to rig the up-coming Legislative and Municipal Elections in favour of the CPDM.

The UPC militants asserted that with biometric registration, cards are normally supposed to be issued to voters immediately they register. The party militants also insisted that considering the population of Cameroon, ELECAM is supposed to target some 12 million Cameroonians for voter registration, and not the low figure of seven million currently set by the institution as the target.

The six points contained in the tracts which the UPC militants distributed were some of the demands or proposals that the party has been putting out for some two years now, for the reform of the Electoral Law. UPC Mack-Kit, among other things, wants the voting age to be reduced to 18 years as well as a two-round presidential election.

Source: CPO

 

Biya Takes Nation By Storm: Announces Senatorial Elections For April 14

Against popular expectations, President Biya has billed senatorial elections for Sunday, April 14. Biya made the announcement in a Presidential decree that was broadcast on State radio on Wednesday, February 27. Biya surprised the nation by deciding to organize senatorial elections before municipal elections.

He also made nonsense of the appeal of the leading opposition Chieftain, SDF Chairman, John Fru Ndi, that it was logical for municipal and parliamentary elections to be organised first.

The announcement means that the ruling party will carry the day since the Electoral College for the senatorial election is made up of councilors. In the 2007 council elections, the CPDM emerged with a controversial majority of councils following reports that the polls were heavily rigged.

The news of the election was broken after Prime Minister, Philemon Yang, had convened Fru Ndi and some other political leaders to give them the information before it could be announced.

But Fru Ndi told journalists at his Yaounde Omnisport residence that the Prime Minister did not have the opportunity to break the scoop to them given that before they arrived at the Star Building, the State radio had already broken the news. He said, while traveling from Bamenda Wednesday morning, he delayed at Obala because he was involved in an accident.

Fru Ndi said a motorcyclist who was carrying one person suddenly bumped into his car. The motorcyclist and his passenger died on the spot, Fru Ndi narrated. “That is what delayed me and before I went to the Prime Minister’s Office, the radio had broken the news,” he said. Reacting to the convening of the electorate, Fru Ndi still repeated what he had said several times before: “The SDF will not allow senatorial elections to hold before municipal elections.”

He said if senatorial elections are predicated on the present councilors whose mandate had long expired, it will not have any iota of legitimacy. To him, the 2007 municipal elections were heavily rigged in favour of the ruling CPDM party. He said all the stakeholders were unanimous that the election which was organised by the defunct National Elections Observatory, NEO, was a total mess.

To Fru Ndi, even President Biya, in tandem, with all other stakeholders admitted that the 2007 polls were heavily flawed. Fru Ndi warned that the senatorial elections will not be organised in the present situation if Biya does not sit down with him to explain on what logic he convened the electorate under such messy conditions.

Asked what he would do if Biya ignores his threats, Fru Ndi retorted: “I and SDF militants will sharpen our machetes and come out for a full-blown onslaught to stop the election.”  Fru Ndi said, while he was looking for every means for Cameroon to remain peaceful, Biya was instead looking for all avenues to provoke a civil war.

He warned that by convening the electorate for senatorial elections against popular opinion that municipal elections be organised first, Biya was pushing Cameroonians to the wall. With their backs on the wall, they will be forced to fight back, he said. Meanwhile, the councilors that make up the Electoral College for the elections are predominantly CPDM. Following the current dispensation, only a few parties would be involved in the senatorial elections.

The ruling CPDM party has 300 out of 360 councils. The opposition parties have 60 as follows: the Social Democratic Front, SDF- 18, the National Union for Democracy and Progress, NUDP-11 and shares some 9 councils with the CPDM, the Cameroon Democratic Union- 8, the Movement for the Defense of the Republic MDR- 5, the Union des Population du Cameroun, UPC- 2 councils and others.

Although there are conflicting statistics as to the number of councils that each party won in 2007, it is clear that the CPDM has some 10,632 councilors while the SDF has 801. NUDP of Bello Bouba Maigari has 389 councilors. From this premise, it is clear that the CPDM will have an overwhelming majority in the Upper House of Parliament.

According to varsity don and political scientist, Dr. Mathias Owona Nguini, it will be the worst thing to happen because the present councilors were elected in the 2007 municipal elections that were heavily flawed. The election, he said, was fraught with irregularities and widespread rigging in favour of the ruling CPDM. It was due to such rigging that the Supreme Court ordered for a rerun of the polls in certain areas.

One of the areas where a rerun took place was the Lobo Council in the Lekie Division of the Centre Region. Partial elections were equally organised in Douala II, Bafang, Mogode, Matomb, Pette and Mesondo councils. Due to its sophisticated rigging machinery, CPDM still carried the day at the end of the exercise. There is evidence that the opposition parties going in for the race will face a crushing defeat from the CPDM.

For one thing, the law governing the organisation of senatorial elections empowers the President of the Republic to appoint 30 percent of the senators. This means that Biya will appoint 30 out of the 100 senators that will make up the Upper House of Parliament as provided for by the 1996 constitution.

By virtue of last Wednesday’s Presidential decree, campaigns for the senatorial elections will begin on March 30. Candidates for the election have to pay a caution fee of FCFA one million.  According to another Presidential decree, each member of the electorate will be paid FCFA 50,000 allowance on Election Day.

Souce: CPO

Southern Cameroons Urges Nigeria To Take Case To UN

The Nigerian Government has been given a 30-day ultimatum to respect an Abuja High Court judgement on the restoration of Southern Cameroons statehood with the United Nations, UN.

The peoples of the Southern Cameroons have, through their Counsel, Okoi Obono-Obia, written a letter to the Attorney General of Nigeria and Minister of Justice, Mohamed Bello Adoke (SAN), urging the Federal Government to immediately comply with the Consent Judgement in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/30/2002, dated March 25, 2002.

The judgement was delivered by the former Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Hon. Justice Rosaline Ukeje, which is in their favour. The Consent Order directed the Federal Republic of Nigeria to take any measures as may be necessary to place the case of the peoples of the geographical entity known as at October 1, 1960, as Southern Cameroons, for self-determination before the UN General Assembly and any other relevant international organisation.

The letter, dated January 27, 2013, was served on the Attorney General on February 8, 2013, urged the Federal Government of Nigeria, in the spirit and adherence to the Rule of Law and Constitutionalism, especially the authority and integrity of the judicial branch of the of Government, to take immediate steps to ensure compliance by the Federal Government of Nigeria with the terms/directives in the said Consent Judgement/ Order.

Accordingly, the Federal Government of Nigeria was given an ultimatum of 30 days from the date of the receipt of the letter to take steps to ensure compliance with the said Consent Judgement/Order; failure of which they will instruct their Counsel to institute proceedings to compel the Federal Government of Nigeria to comply with the said Consent Judgement/Order. The Federal Government, theretofore, has until March 10, to comply.

The peoples of Southern Cameroons represented by Dr. Kevin Ngwang Ngumni, Augustine Feh Ndangam, Chief Ette Otun Ayamba, Professor Victor Mukwele, Dr. Martin Ngeka, Nfor Ngala Nfor, Hitler Mbinglo, Henry Dobgima K Mundam, Simon Ninpa, Shey Tafon, Paul Yiwir, and Isaac Sona had sued the Federal Government of Nigeria in the Federal High Court, Abuja, by Originating Summons seeking determination of the following questions:

Whether the Union envisaged  under the Southern Cameroons Plebiscite in 1961 between La République du Cameroun and Southern Cameroons legally took effect as contemplated by the relevant United Nations Resolutions, particularly the United Nations Resolution 1352 (XIV) of October 16, 1959 and United Nations Trusteeship Council Resolution 2013 (XXIV) of May 31, 1960?

Whether the termination by the Government of the United Kingdom of its Trusteeship over the Southern Cameroons on September 30, 1961, without ensuring prior Implementation of the Constitutional arrangements under which the Southern Cameroons and La République du Cameroun were to unite as one Federal State was not in breach of Articles 3 and 6 of the Trusteeship Agreement for the territory of the Cameroons under British Administration approved General Assembly of the United Nations on December 13, 1946, the United Nations General Assembly Resolutions 1352 of October 16, 1959 ; 1608 of April 2, 1961, the United Nations Trusteeship Council Resolution 2013 (XIV) of May 31, 1960 and Article 76 (b) of the Charter of the United Nations?

Was the Assumption of Sovereign Powers on October 1 1961 and the continued exercise of same by the Government of La République du Cameroun over the Southern Cameroons after the termination by the Government of the United Kingdom or its Trusteeship over the territory legal and valid when the Union between Southern Cameroons and La République du Cameroun contemplated by the Southern Cameroons Plebiscite 1961 had not legally taken effect?

Whether the peoples of Southern Cameroons are not entitled to self-determination within their clearly defined territory separate from La République du Cameroun? Whether it is the Southern Cameroons and not La République du Cameroun that shares a maritime boundary with the Federal Republic of Nigeria?

However, the Federal Government of Nigeria sued for a settlement of the case out of court which led to the delivery of the Consent Judgment dated March 25, 2002, based on the agreement reached by the parties. Today, almost 11 years after, the peoples of Southern Cameroons want the Federal Government of Nigeria to comply with the Consent Judgement/Order.
Bakassi Returnees Sue Federal Gov’t

In a related story, the Daily Independent recently posted a case in which returnees of the Uruan Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State extraction have sued the Federal Government of Nigeria before an Abuja High Court, claiming 30 billion Naira as damages over alleged acts of betrayal, leading to the loss of their ancestral home at the Bakassi Peninsula to Cameroon.

“In a writ of summons and statement of claim filed through their counsel, Ukeme Ekpenyong, the plaintiffs include Augustine Bassey Efiong, Sila Clement Etim, Efiong Bassey Ekanen and Imaobong Edem Efiong (suing for themselves and on behalf of Bakassi Returnees of Uruan Local Government Area Extraction),” reports the Daily Independent article signed by Joe Nwankwo in Abuja and Bassey Inyang in Calabar.

Vox pop: Must Biya Hide His Buea Visit Date?

Several Cameroonians were interviewed and below are their individual opinions on Biya’s ‘Visit’ to Buea.

1. He Is Not Ready.

Biya is the Head of State and has the Cameroon programme in hand and so doesn’t need to give an account of his departure to anyone if he doesn’t deem it fit. If he hasn’t said anything about the date, then it could be that he is not ready and in such a case, he cannot give any precise date because he doesn’t want to disappoint the people again.

Sama, Administrator, Yaounde.

2. Biya Should Give A Specific Date.

I think the President should be able to give a specific date to enable the population to properly mobilise for his coming. We know that, as the supreme head of the country, he has the right to visit any region at any time without even seeking the opinions of the locals.

But with the destruction and frequent clean-up campaigns instituted by the council under the guise of presidential visit, which date is unknown, is greatly affecting not only businesses but also the inhabitants of Buea. For how long are we going to carry on with this activity?

Kenneth Ndze, Businessman, Buea.

3. Biya Is Scared.

Biya is scared. The Southern Cameroons issue has existed for long now and the people have a grudge, and this worsened when he didn’t keep to his promise of visiting the Southwest. I even heard the people once promised to burn him to death. This has scared him and even if he announces a date for his trip to Buea it is likely that he will send a representative. I think Biya is just deceiving the people just like before. He won’t go to Buea.

Kelly, Barber, Yaounde.

4. The President Is Not Supposed To Unveil Date.

Under normal circumstances, the President is not supposed to unveil the date of his visit for security reasons. We know that such a high profile personality like the President needs maximum protection, especially on very special State visits like the one he is about to make to Buea. When he must have been sure that the security network in Buea is in place, he can then give an exact date. Also, the President’s schedule is so tight that he needs time to actually give a date that will not clash with his personal programme.

Aaron Prosper Bias, Accountant, Buea.

5. Biya’s Visits Have Often Been A Mystery.

President Biya’s visits have always been a mystery. He has never disclosed his working or visiting calendar as most of his moves are usually a surprise to the citizens. I think this is not good when it comes to issues of the State.

He has ideas of what needs to be done but I suspect that the resources to get such wishes come to reality are not properly managed. His collaborators are not helping him especially in the work they need to do ahead of his visit to Buea. I wish he announces the visit to Buea for May 20, 2013, because that town is also part of Cameroon.

Rev. Richard Ngassa Kessou, Yaounde.

6. The President Isn’t Hiding Date.

I think the President is not hiding the date of his visit to Buea because he was supposed to have visited Buea since last year. But it seems as if the people he assigned to prepare the necessary logistics for his visit are not ready. Until Buea is ready to host the President before he will make public the date.

Eno Tanyi, Teacher, GTHS Buea.

7. The Secrecy Is Out Of Fear Or Contempt.

If Biya’s visit is shrouded in much secrecy, it could be out of two things; fear or contempt or simply the two. Biya promised the people earlier of his visit but never honoured his promise, and just like the other time he fears something might go wrong. Secondly, Biya might just despise the people of the Region and decide not to visit them at all.

Augustine Meh Zang, Director, Computer Institute, Yaounde.

8. He Wants To Get Things Ready.

I think he doesn’t want to be embarrassed because he has compared the level of the work done on the ground.  Drawing lessons from what happened in the past, because you will recall that some time ago, he was told all was ready and he announced elections only to discover on election day that not everything was in place.

He was forced to postpone the elections. This is on account that he has given assignments to be done and he is monitoring the level of work and if it is not satisfactory, he would not announce the date.

Choves Loh, Regional Chief Cameroon Tribune, NW.

9. Only He And God Know What He Is Afraid Of.

Which date has Biya ever announced? Not even the date of Cameroon football finals are ever known ahead of time. It is announced a few hours to the day. Only he and God know what he is afraid of. This is one more proof if you needed any that his is a government by improvisation. We are used to it, but I think it is high time we got out of this mess.

Wilfred Tassang, Moderator Club2020, Bamenda.

10. Biya Knows What State Secrets Are.

I am very convinced that President Biya knows what State secrets are and until everything is in place his date to Buea remains a secret.

Tamnjong N., Chief of Personnel, Basic Education, Northwest.

11. Biya Is Unsure Of Event.

I am sure that the Head of State is not yet certain that the event will hold and as such no need announcing the date.

Christopher Akunchum, Carpenter, Mbingo.

12. Many Things Must Be Put In Place.

I do not think that President Biya is actually hiding his date of visit to Buea. Before coming to Buea, so many things must be put in place like the roads, hotels, and other infrastructural logistics. Until these factors are put in place he cannot actually give a date for his visit.

John Tendong Esegemu, Consultant, Buea.

13. Biya Needs Rest Like Pope Benedict XVI.

It is not a normal thing and some people may argue that the date is kept secret for security reasons. But Biya is seemingly afraid to move even within his own country. I have the feeling that he feels more at ease out of Cameroon than when he is here. If the date of the visit is announced well ahead of time, the committee members preparing for the visit will work better while contractors working on the development projects will be forced to also work within the time frame

By the way, development projects are supposed to be implemented across the country irrespective of the fact that Biya is visiting an area or not. I can tell you that many people are no longer interested in the visit because of the procrastinations. I think the President needs a deserved rest after working for all this while just like Pope Benedict XVI has done.

Mercy Bilem, Yaounde.

14. He Should Announce The Date.

I am disappointed with him for continuously hiding his visit to Buea. He should announce the date so that the population should prepare to welcome him.  If you are the President for the people, elected by the people, you must not hide your visit. When we have an august guest, we must prepare for his visit.

Gwendoline Manka, Journalist Hot Cocoa, Bamenda.

15. Authorities Should Conceal Date.

Many people are anxious to know when the Head of State will be coming to Buea. But it is appropriate for the authorities to conceal the date for security reasons. Knowing how the society is; the President may not tell the people when he will actually come. But he can give them a period say three months or five months, but to give them the exact date will not be possible, for security reasons.

Alfred Meende, Civil Servant, Buea.

13 Reasons Why A Valid History Of Cameroon Is Yet To Be Written

A country is worth its History. This is because, from the authentic history of any country, a conscious leadership is born and enabled to handle competently, not only the crucial issues of the hour, but also the planning (with a vision), of the important ventures of the future.

It is because of the type of national history that the citizens of a country are exposed to, that we today have a Cameroon character, a Nigerian character, a Ghanaian character, an Ivorian character and so on.  For, this character always stands on a history, whether this history is true or false and, most unfortunately, it is this character that produces the leadership of each country which, in turn, dictates its pace of development or, in some pitiful cases, its pace of underdevelopment.

Today, many African countries lament about their leadership but the crucial question is this: On which history do these leaders stand? Do they know the true history of the countries most of them did not even apply to rule? What is to be expected of a leader who does not even know his country? I bet, very little.

So, this paper sets out not to lay the blame but rather the assignment at the doorstep of the Cameroonian historian – the re-writing of Cameroon’s history. And, like the clinical handling of any disease, the first step is a diagnosis: why has this history not been written so far? Why is the history we have today so superficial, fragmented, biased, battered, mutilated, doctored and full of gaps and disturbing silences?

The first reason is that most of our historians on both sides of the Mungo are not bilingual and have, consequently, found it difficult to explore and make good use of crucial documents written in their second received language, be it English or French. They have, consequently, not been able to benefit from the support that a writer gets from another’s findings, as they have continued grappling, each in the language he masters.

Secondly, many crucial documents about Cameroon history are rather found in Europe, especially in Germany, France and Britain and it has proved prohibitingly expensive, especially for young historians, to go to these countries and dig up the facts. Worse still, some of this information is still kept in the confidential or classified files of the secret intelligence services of these countries and is, consequently, still unavailable to historians.

Thirdly, most important Cameroonian political leaders of the first generation have died leaving no ‘memoirs’, biographies or any published documents that historians can use to understand the motives of most of their actions. To my mind, of all the politicians that have rocked the political landscape in Anglophone Cameroon, only Nerius Namata Mbile and Albert Wuma Mukong have left behind documents that can benefit a historian.

This is such a serious problem to Cameroon as a country, that if the children of those politicians who did not publish any document before dying are in possession of any, they owe a duty to this country to publish such a document or make it known that such a document exists. East of the Mungo, we have only Albert Eyinga and Monga Beti who have made serious publications about their political roles.

The fourth reason is that it took very long for Cameroon history to become part of the syllabuses of official examinations in Cameroon itself. Pupils and students spent their time on ancient history and European history, and only came back home to talk about such banalities as ‘Rio dos cameroes’ and ‘Too late Hewett’. So, historians were not motivated by a ready market for their books if they wrote on Cameroon history.

Fifthly, most Cameroonian historians of the first generation were government employees who took the selfish stand of defending their jobs and guaranteeing their promotion rather than writing the true history of their country. These careerists, rather than steering clear of writing, became official historians.

Lamentably, official historians, like court poets, only set out to please their masters. They magnify anything positive and only render in euphemistic or litotic terms anything negative.  As a matter of fact, they set out to write the epic of their leader.  That is why there is a disturbing absence of a sense of proportion and intellectual honestly in most existing Cameroon history books today.

They sixth reason is that most of the existing historians lack a sense of commitment. They write out of a desire for gain and not out of patriotism. Their goal is, therefore, not the development of their county but their profit. That is why most of them believe in, and respect ‘no go’ areas in Cameroon history.

The seventh reason is the antagonistic posture of the politician or the man of power towards the intellectual. This intimidates some would–be historians even from taking a decision to write and pushes those who dare to write, to self–censorship. This is an area where politicians need to review their stand because they are the ultimate beneficiaries of a true and authentic history of the country and the final victims of a false history even though it initially gives them the illusion of success.

The eighth obstacle, that the Cameroonian historian has always had, is government propaganda which uses many formulae, ranging from selective provision of information through doctored data to the fact that for a long time after independence, private media were either absent or very weak.

Furthermore, another difficulty of the Cameroonian historian, which might not be entirely of his own making, is the unconscious legitimising of a colonial viewpoint. Indeed, Cameroonian historians have often not had a Cameroonian point of view that is so present in the county’s oral literature and so have annoyingly repeated the same vocabulary as used by colonialists to legitimise colonialism and neo-colonialism.

Further still, existing textbooks are replete with very negative evaluative references to, and even subconscious prejudices against the “Union des Populations du Cameroun” (U.P.C.) and the opposition Social Democratic Front (S.D.F.), that even some of the major authors seem not to be aware of.

Consequently, this consistently exhibited bias and other errors of commission and omission, make their texts lack the required balance and objectivity of a valid history. Again, there is a failure on the part of our historians to incorporate Cameroonian interpretations of their history which are readily available in the oral literatures of Cameroonian tribes, especially as regard the colonial and post-colonial periods.

The penultimate difficulty of the Cameroonian historian, even today, is the induced absence of a reading culture in the citizenry.  This means that, for the historian who chooses to write the true history, he can neither hope to have his book on the official school booklists nor count on an independent reading public for financial support. And he therefore, lamentably, finds himself only with the drinking adult population which calculates its money in terms of bottles of beer.

Last but not the least is the failure of mainstream churches to preserve our history by keeping vital documents and making them available to researchers. In most counties in the Western World, even when intellectual freedoms have been almost inexistent, the monasteries, seminaries and other such institutions have always safeguarded the truth for posterity. These institutions still need to prove that they have carried out this mission in Cameroon.

All said, it is very common today to pick up a book with a very lofty and attractive title on Cameroon history, only for it to fail the litmus test – woefully. So, we need to become conscious of our history as a crucial determinant of our development and, therefore, strive to create an enabling environment for true historians to emerge, so that a genuine Cameroon history can one day be written.

Source: CPO

“FECAFOOT Wants To Assassinate Me” – Samuel Eto’o Fils says.

Indomitable Lions captain, Samuel Eto’o Fils, has claimed that officials of the Cameroon Football Federation, FECAFOOT, want to assassinate him.

The assassination claim will further strain the already sour relationship between the four times African Footballer- of- the- Year, and FECAFOOT officials. “FECAFOOT wants to assassinate me,” Eto’o said in a video conference with the satirical online magazine, Je Wanda. This declaration by the football star hit the public last week and is making its rounds in the media and the public sphere.

The declaration made days after Eto’o supposedly suffered from a back pain and failed to show up for the friendly in which the Taifa Stars humiliated the Indomitable Lions 1-0. Eto’o, who has been critical of the poor management of the federation, indicated that the federation is after his life.

“I have been living in the national team with gendarmes; a gendarme sleeps at my door. I get my sport kit directly from Puma and I am particular about what I eat during training with the national team,” Eto’o told youths on a Skype conference. However, FECAFOOT Communication Officer, Junior Binyam said, after listening to Eto’o, he (Eto’o) is not saying anything concrete and is not quoting the name of the person after his life.

A source at the federation said Eto’o is in quest for power and serving the interest of a group of powerful people operating in the background. However, to Eto’o, officials of the federation who are incompetent and corrupt should resign. He insinuated that the old people of the federation have embezzled a lot of money at the expense of the players.

“Instead of managing football for the good of all, the federation officials are preoccupied with fictitious missions abroad in first class with unsuspicious bank accounts in Europe,” he said.
Meanwhile, commenting on the just ended African Cup of Nations, he said the level of the competition was good. To him, Cameroon is below standard compared to Togo, following its (Togo’s) Nations Cup performance.

Eto’o maintained that he would have loved to come to Cameroon and play games in the night in good pitches. He accused Camfoot.com-an online publication dedicated to information on football – of being pocketed by the federation that gives it millions.

Retaliating to the claims, Camfoot.com on its part says Eto’o is the worst captain ever in the history of Cameroon football. After Eto’o’s media outing, many seem to doubt the reason for his absence for the friendly against Tanzania. With the assassination claim, Eto’o has probably opened another scandal that may rage for sometimes.

 

Fru Ndi Reshuffles Shadow Cabinet.

The Chairman of the SDF, Ni John Fru Ndi, has reshuffled the Shadow Cabinet of the party, with about 85 percent of Ministers and Vices being new comers. This was done at the end of the National Executive Committee (NEC), of the SDF meeting in Bamenda over the weekend.

The greatest casualty of the shake up is Madam Chantal Kambiwa, who was dropped from her position as Chairperson of Gender Issues. The position has been modified to Gender Issues and The Physically Challenged, now headed by Miss Judith Zama. Meanwhile, old names like Hon Cyprian Awudu Mbaya was maintained as Chairperson of Foreign Affairs, and Legal and Judicial Affairs by Prof. Kofele Kale.

Other members of the new shadow cabinet are:

  • Agriculture and Rural Development, Chairperson: Mathias Ofon,
  • Defence and National Security: Colonel Chi Ngafor,
  • Economy, Finance and Commerce, Chairperson: Evariste Fopoussi,
  • Education and Training, Chairperson: Jean Takoungang,
  • Health, Chairperson: Prof Joseph Nelson Fomulu,
  • Information and the Media, Chairperson: Jean Robert Wafo,
  • Industrial Development, Chairperson: Jean Claude Kuete,
  • Internal Affairs, Chairperson: Mochiggle Vanigansen,
  • Posts and Telecommunications, Chairperson: Chief Paul Nji Tumasang,
  • Science and Technology, Chairperson: Gabriel Wato,
  • Social Affairs, Sports and Youth Development, Chairperson: Prof. Paul Kwi,
  • Tourism and Culture, Chairperson: Ebelle Din Dobel,
  • Public Works and Transport, Chairperson: Johnas Achah Mbah,
  • Mining, Water and Energy, Chairperson: Alexander Mulango Forteh,
  • Urban Development and Housing, Chairperson: Prof. Ajaga Nji.

Source: CPO

The Energy Problem Is Beginning To See A Solution

This writer has put in print in past publications both in the English and French languages, articles addressing the electrical energy situation in our dear country Cameroon, and at the same time suggesting solutions to this endemic problem.

Now that the LOM PANGAR, MEMVE’ELE and MEKIN hydro electric projects, along with the KRIBI gas-to-electricity project are being implemented or seeing a beginning to such, we say bravo!! to His Excellency Paul BIYA for, it is better late than never. President Paul BIYA has worked tirelessly in this very important domain of energy self-sufficiency for Cameroon since he created, in the year 2006, the Electricity Development Corporation (EDC).

The dam being built at LOM PANGAR, with a storage capacity of about 6 billion cubic meters of water, will improve by about 62 percent the energy producing capacities of both the EDEA and SONG LOULOU hydro-electric power stations, and this as early as 2015.

The MEMVE’ELE power station will bring in an additional 201MW of generating capacity, the MEKIN project will add another 15 MW, the LOM PANGAR project will bring in 30 MW for the Eastern Region of the country, and the KRIBI gas-to-electricity project will add a further 216MW of new power to the national electricity grid.

In perspective therefore, Cameroon should have a total new generation capacity of about 462MW within the next five years, without forgetting the improvement that will be brought to the Edea and Song Loulou hydro facilities by the Lom Pangar project. Cameroon’s total generating capacity by the year 2017 could be about 1595 MW, including both hydro and thermal plants around the country.

Does this optimistic picture mean all has been said and done in the power generating capacity for Cameroon in the coming years? Not so soon I would say, because, a condition for Cameroon to be an emergent nation by the year 2035 as targeted, is for her to have full energy self-sufficiency with a reserve capacity of between 10 to 15 percent.

We should equally be able to export electrical energy to neighbouring countries like Nigeria, Chad and the Central African Republic. With the above in mind, Cameroon should have a generating capacity of at least 3000MW by the emergent year 2035, if she really plans on being an emergent nation by that time.
Recommendations:
1.    That any on-going studies and discussions pertaining to huge hydro projects like the MENCHUM and NACHTIGAL be speeded-up in order that these projects become a reality in the next couple of years;
2.    That Independent Power Producers (IPPs) be encouraged to come into the country through various incentives that Government should provide;

3.    That alternative sources of energy like solar, wind and natural gas derived power be encouraged in the coming years;

4.    That the use of natural gas as a combustible fuel for power generation, such as is being done at the KRIBI thermal plant, be enhanced to other areas like LIMBE which is not too distant from the oil and gas fields in the Rio-del-Rey;

5.    That a NATIONAL ENERGY FUND be put in place, the monies to this FUND being derived from taxes imposed on all energy consumers (house-holds, businesses, industry and the State) as well as from part of the annual Cameroon Government public investment budget;

6.    That energy awareness, energy economy and energy efficiency be promoted among the Cameroonian public at large through the various public and private media.

Conclusion: President BIYA has very well kick-started the process of getting Cameroon back into normalcy as far as the power generating capacity of the country is concerned. What is now left to be done is a vigorous follow-up of this process in the coming years. Therefore, all hands have to be on deck as of this moment, if we sincerely hope to enjoy emergence by the year 2035!

*Electrical Engineer/Senior Energy Consultant
ENERGYAWARE, Cameroon Consultants Limited (ECCL)

Source: CPO

The University Of Buea Crisis: The Unspoken Truth And The Way Forward. – Prof. Michael A Yanou*

The University of Buea has had a turbulent history which has claimed student lives in the past and only recently resulted in the dishonourable act of taking the Vice Chancellor, Prof. Nalova Lyonga, hostage for about five hours.


The events in UB have unfortunately continued to evolve negatively with the recent incident being the teleguided declaration by Fako Chiefs that threatened to use unorthodox methods to eliminate students and lecturers from other regions whom they suspect are forming the crisis to remove the current VC, a daughter of the soil.

The Region may not have been mentioned, nor those who teleguided them disclosed, but everyone knows what is actually happening! It is perhaps necessary as someone who has been teaching at UB since 1996 and spent the last five years as the President of the lecturers’ union (SYNES) to use this opportunity to disclose certain hidden truths to the Cameroonian public about the root causes of the crisis in UB.

I do this because of the fear of God and the need to ensure that for once we chart a new path towards sustainable peace at the University. At the root of the student crisis is the structure the student union government, otherwise called UBSU, should take. For students, it should ideally have a strong executive and a council (legislature). Their mantra is that the executive be elected in a popular vote by all students.

They argue that this is what the students who were killed during one of the strikes fought for and to abandon that will be the ultimate betrayal. Successive UB administrations and VCs alternatively believe in a weak student union government constituted by an executive which is voted by faculty presidents and not the student body. Between these two positions, both parties have never been able to find a middle ground.

To resolve this tension, UB administration has used two methods; they divide students and bribe some of them to support their preferred model and at other times try to force down the new model using selected students without involving the entire student body. The misfortune of this approach lies in the fact that these students who are selected and bribed are sometimes given the mandate by top UB officials to violently undermine their opponents leading to pitch battles on campus.

The various camps have regrettably been also used by certain top management to cause strikes and disturbances on campus using money as the major incentive. Closely connected to this dichotomy is the very sinister reality that students in these camps have been recruited and paid to cause violent strikes (including the hostage incident) to create a situation where a sitting VC is dropped to make room for a rival deputy.

Prof. Njeuma fell from power because students supported by some of her close collaborators made the university ungovernable. The last but one VC had his ultimate demise because one camp of students were actively involved in making the campus ungovernable with the view that he be dropped for those controlling these students to step into power.

When the current VC was taken hostage, I was solicited and succeeded to talk the students into releasing her not however without strong resistance from one of the camps of the students. Their resistance was partly because they did not want me to take credit for causing her release because it will undermine the agenda of their master who organised the hostage taking.

The idea is to once more demonize an existing VC as a failure who should give room to a rival deputy this all the more so since according to them is an aberration for an Associate Professor to be appointed in preference to them. In always trying to accede to power through using students to disrupt normal university life, top management feed their friends in the security with misinformation. Such misinformation will always include pointing fingers at the lecturers union, tribalisation of the events at UB, etc.
To understand the student crisis is to ask and answer the question who is the obvious beneficiary in the situation where a sitting VC is dropped? Only the blind and the hypocritical will identify SYNES and/or its President or UBSU and/its leadership as the beneficiary.
There is a lecturers’ angle to this crisis as well.

The vaulting ambition to be appointed to positions of responsibility (Heads of Department and Deans) is a major weakness in the UB system. Some lecturers will even sell their mothers if that is what it will take to be appointed. Such lecturers are vulnerable potential recruits for ambitious deputies in top management who use them to coordinate camps of students in the hope of achieving their ultimate prize.

Some of them are members of SYNES and are prepared to destroy the union for its insistence on respect for Articles 26, 54 and 74(c) of Decree No 93/034 of 1993, the law creating UB. This law states categorically that the VC, Deans and Heads of Department should be elected by academic staff before the Minister of Higher Education and President of the Republic signs the decree appointing them to their positions.

Although the demand for such elections is a legitimate aspiration, the union has never used underhand methods to achieve this goal. No SYNES official, past or present, has ever benefited directly from the dropping of a VC or Dean due to a strike. To point a finger at SYNES as the author of strikes on campus is to say the least the height of hypocrisy.

 

The Way Forward

UB administration should engage with the student body to determine by consensus in a give and take manner the method and extent of reforming the union if that is the true objective. Banning UBSU, starving them of funds or using one group of students to hoist a “reformed” student union on campus is an unattainable objective.

Recruiting and cultivating student groups through financial inducements by top UB administrators should be discouraged. One way of doing so is to ensure that academic staff be involved in the selection process of officials to post of responsibility in the university. Government policy of picking a Deputy Vice Chancellor (DVC) to replace a dropped VC is the bane of the crisis in UB.

As President of SYNES UB, let it be known that some DVCs have made subtle offers to me to use the union to foment trouble in the past without success. Guess their objective! Consider the issue of allowing students form prayer groups that pray regularly on campus in the same way as music and cultural groups operate freely. The blood of Jesus can bring permanent peace at UB!

Prof. Michael A Yanou

*BL (Nig), PhD (Rhodes), Fellow, Wolfson College, Cambridge

“UB Students Are Angry” – Interview with UBSU President.

The peace that has been reigning on the campus of the University of Buea, UB, for a while now has suddenly been replaced by a strike action. Wednesday, February 6, Executive members of the University of Buea Students’ Union, UBSU, called for a strike action.

In an eight-point memorandum addressed to the Vice Chancellor, Dr. Nalova Lyonga, UBSU is demanding  amongst others; that online registration problems in the university should be given prompt attention, that on-campus businesses, especially photocopiers, should be reinstated to facilitate the teaching and learning process, that students should be allowed to seat for examination upon part payment of their registration fees of FCFA 25,000, that the various modes of transcripts should be respected and made available on time to stop exploitation of students.

In the heart of the strike action, the Acting President of UBSU, Ronald Minang, told The Post that students are angry. He gives reasons in this interview. Read On!

The peace we’ve had on UB campus has suddenly gone dead, what’s the problem?
The appointment of Dr. Nalova Lyonga, as the VC of UB, was warmly welcomed by all and we expected that she was going to work for the good of all in the UB community.

But things are not going as expected. Before the current memo in circulation, UBSU has written to the VC five times, calling for negotiation meetings on the problems faced by students on campus. She granted us two audiences but they ended in a fiasco. When we get to the meetings, what we got was intimidation of students’ leaders.

She will end the meetings at their convenience and nothing concrete is done. You will see that there is no dialogue. So, today, Wednesday, February 6, the UBSU executive decided to call for a general assembly of all the students. We did not stop classes; we went around informing the students about the general assembly that had to hold.
What do you mean by ‘intimidation of students’ leaders at your meetings with the UB administration?
They tell us we’re instigating strike actions on campus and if we do, we will be severely sanctioned. For instance, during the collection of students’ dues, the UB campus was militarised and students harassed. The presence of police on campus was not accepted by the student body.
Before this strike action, has your executive met with the UB administration to discuss some of the issues you have raised?
On Monday, February 4, I went to see the VC and she asked me to wait for her at the Board Room of the Central Administration Building. I called for some of the executive members of UBSU and the Faculties to join me, but she came and insisted that she will have an audience with me alone. I insisted that I will stay with the rest of the executive members, she will not accept.

However, I went in and with only three minutes of discussions, I told her that the UBSU executive’s primary concern is the organisation of the UBSU central and Council elections as per the constitution and rules and regulation governing UB. The UB administration has refused to organise the elections and strategising on squashing UBSU. UBSU is the only voice that liaises the students and the administration. You can’t run the university without collaboration from the students.

Why do you think the UB administration is interested in killing UBSU?
We’ve been writing to the VC and she’s not interested in listening to us. We were supposed to have a meeting today, February 6. She called for all the Presidents of the establishment but sidelined UBSU. The executive members of UBSU who have graduated are no longer on campus like the former President of UBSU, Hailshamy Ashu.

So who is she looking for? We have the impression she wants to maintain the old administration of UBSU, who to my judgment were pro-administration and not highlighting the concerns of UB students. If the Ministry of Higher Education can’t squash UBSU, it is not the VC that will do it.
Amongst your grievances, you stated that students be allowed to seat for examination upon part payment of their registration fee of FCFA 25,000. Will that not give students the opportunity to go away without paying their money after doing the exams?
It’s not a situation that started today. For six years, students have been doing the part payment and moving on with their exams. Where the UB administration comes in and timely is for the Level 400 students, who can’t get anything from the UB administration if they have not completed their registration.

You cannot do your clearance in UB if you have not complied with your registration fee of FCFA 50,000. So, if you allow students to pay the registration fee at once, it is difficult for some students and parents. UB is subsidised by the State, so there is room for the administration to be flexible. Students will never get their complete results if they don’t finish their registration fee.
When the online registration started, a lot of students praised it; what has suddenly gone wrong now?
The problems are coming from the UB administration. We can’t come in a day and want to change to a computerised system. We are in an African setting with all the difficulties we know. The progress made by the US was not a day’s effort. We believe that if something has to start, it must go through a process.

In 2010, we started the online registration but it was going along side manual registration, to study how effective the system will be. This year, the system was hijacked, the UB website is too small to carry the number of users. Students have done their best to meet up with the registration process but the problem is with the UB administration.
Concretely, what do you need to get a transcript in UB? You raised it as one of your problems?

To apply for a transcript, you have three options; the normal mode, the fast mode and the super fast mode. For the normal mode, you pay FCFA 1,000; for the fast mode you pay FCFA 2,000 which you will receive after five days and for the super fast mode, you will pay FCFA 5,000 which you will receive in three hours.

Students have been paying in this money, even the super fast mode, since December 2012, transcripts have not been issued. Former students pay FCFA 5,000 to apply for transcripts, yet nothing comes out. We have made formal complaints to UB administration and nothing has been done as we speak. That’s exploitation to my reading. Those problems have to be redressed.
Now, classes are not holding, what do you expect from you Vice Chancellor?

It is simple. We’ve presented to the VC a number of problems. At the general assembly, a good chunk of UB students and the administrators were present. The students are asking for their problems to be solved and they will get back to their classes. Before we left the UB campus, the students’ body made it clear that if the VC does not seek a solution to their problems, there will be no classes till further notice.
Are you convinced the 8-point problems raised can be solved at a go?
Before Dr Nalova came to the show, these are some of the problems we had with the former VC. We thought that she already understood our problems and will solve them. So, it has come to our notice she is not interested in looking at our difficulties.

Since she took the helm of power in UB, UBSU has written to her and she has never replied our letters. UBSU is part and parcel of UB. We’ve to work in synergy but that’s not the case. We’re not informed of what is happening on campus. She has the powers to solve the problems as fast as possible.
How much collaboration do have with the Director of Students’ Affairs to ensure the flow of information across the students’ body?
We believe that the Director of Students’ Affairs has the prime mission to work with students, but this is not the case. The Director of Students’ Affairs has a cordial relationship with the VC, that’s natural, but they go to their offices, take their decisions and implement on the students without studying the effects.

As students’ representatives, what are your expectations?
As at now, the ball is in the court of the VC. If she can redress our problems, all will be fine. The students believe in us. The UBSU executive will never create problems. If the VC can immediately react and solve the problems raised, all will be fine soonest on the campus, especially the elections of the UBSU Central Executive and the Council. Secondly, businesses on campus are a major problem.

In the University of Yaoundé I, they have businesses on campus to ease the learning process for the students. In UB, recently, there was a communiqué banning all businesses on campus. It is bizarre, students are suffering. On campus, notes are photocopied, recto-verso for FCFA 25 but out of campus it is FCFA 50. If we’ve those machines on campus, it will facilitate the learning process.
Are you saying the problems are natural and nobody is instigating UBSU?
During the dues collection, the VC did not give us a voice. She told us dues collection is not compulsory, we accepted and moved on. She has gone ahead and done many things. The problems in UB are artificial.  She should realise that UBSU can also play a part in the development of UB and bring us closer to the administration.

We are on the ground and ready to furnish her with information on what is happening. She does not know the details within the students’ milieu. She shouldn’t get into signing communiqués without looking at the repercussions on the students’ body. In the absence of UBSU, the VC will not be there.

Some people have observed that businesses on UB campus is haphazard so there is a suggestion that there should be a business village, where you can get all what you want in a kind of one-stop-shop. Do you share that view?
What you’ve said is very important. That’s what we’ve been telling the VC. She replied; “How did we study during our days?” there are two things; the time she studied and ours are two different periods. She can’t make that comparison of her time and ours. The world is evolving and we need things to facilitate the learning process.

We proposed to her that she should create a village, where it is a business centre and there you will find everything to buy. We told her the businesses spread across the campus are not a good idea. She promised to look into that. It is more than a month, nothing has been done. The students of UB are angry and they need a solution from her.

 

Source: Cameroonpostline

The Importance of a Parents/Teachers Association (PTA) in Cameroonian Educational Systems.

The parents/teacher association is a body comprising of parents and teachers of an institution of learning who meet annually to discuss matters on the educational, moral and spiritual well-being of the students or pupils of a particular learning institution, either at the elementary or secondary school level.

This body is basically made up of two arms; the Executive and the General Assembly. The general assembly meets once a year, while the executive meets as often as the need arises.

Every child begins life within a particular family. The child is raised and taught some fundamental principles in life, such as what is right and what is wrong, the kind of behaviour that society approves of and those which society regards as anti social. Thus children begin life in a home environment learning and being exposed to life principles. Gradually, as the child grows older it becomes an imperative for the child to meet persons in a different environment where formal education takes place.

This new environment is the school. At the beginning children have difficulties coping and accepting this “strange” place but they gradually begin to become accustomed to it. What is very important to note here is that discipline and learning which was initially and exclusively the responsibility of the parents, must now be shared between parents and teachers. The child begins to learn a lot of things and very new things, new ways of doing things and so forth.

Besides the teachers who have become a new phenomenon in the child’s life, other pupils or students play a role in the life of the child because of constant interaction and communication.  This phenomenon sometimes brings confusing in the mind of the child. It is however a very important process because it is the only means by which a child can acquire formal education and training and gain financial independence in future. Teachers become the watch dogs and the regulators of the new way of life, helping the child to adapt to everything seemingly new for the child.

But because the parents still play an important role in the life of the child, it becomes necessary and important to group the two main actors at this stage of the child’s life to work together in raising a complete human person. The idea of a PARENTS/TEACHERS ASSOCIATION came to be borne out of the necessity to avoid conflicting methods and approaches in raising the child. Suffice it to note that this is a purely ENGLISH SPEAKING TRADITION, in all institutions of learning be it private or public, you will not find one single school in the NW nor SW Regions of Cameroon without a body or association named a PARENTS/TEACHER ASSOCIATION. They have contributed immensely in the educational, material and moral well-being of the children.

 

SHARING IN UPBRINGING:

From the very moment that a child begins school, his or her life is no more influenced by the home environment, but also by the new environment which is the school. Parents are the primary actors in the life of the child and the teachers are secondary actors.  Both are participating in the upbringing of the child in different ways and as a result it becomes very important to establish a common forum for both parents and teachers to come together to discuss issues pertaining to the welfare of the children.

While the children are in school the teachers are acting in loco parentis, especially in the area of discipline, and therefore the necessity for both parties to meet annually to exchange notes and form a common ground of action in the best interest of their children.

 

ACADEMIC WORK AND PERFORMANCE:

Teachers are more involved in the academic work of the children and must see to their academic growth, strength and soundness. Parents are more or less active in this area. It becomes imperative therefore for parents and teacher to meet and discuss the academic development and performance of the children so as to enable the parents to participate by allowing them through discussions to appreciate the standard of learning imparted to the children, be able to understand the difficulties which some children face. Parents are able to the see the importance of following up their children at home because they know the particular difficulties which their children are encountering at school.

Thus in a forum of this nature there is bound to be an entente between the parents and the teachers which go a long way to help the children and take away unnecessary blames and accusation which sometimes, bring gross misunderstanding between parents and teachers with regrettable consequences. Meetings like this have the advantage of a very frank and open discussion which leads to resolutions being taken in the interest of all concerned and as a result avoid unpleasant situations.

 

STANDARDS AND VALUES:

Every educational institution has its own set of values by which the standards of that institution are assessed. It is not sufficient for the school to send to parents, a list of school rules to which the children are to be subjected. It is most important for parents to understand the essence of those rules and regulations. Such understanding can only be derived in a forum of the Parents/teachers meeting. Parents need to understand the rules and regulation so as to encourage their kids to abide by them and as such learn their support to the institution to keep the standards and values in the interest of the kids. Where this is not possible, parents become disgruntled and critical of a system which is rather beneficial to their kids. ( e g owning mobile phones or other electronic gadgets in school, assorted clothes in school, extra food in school etc).

For the standards and values to be maintained parents must contribute their own measure through understanding and participating in maintain those standards.

 

MORAL ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOUR:

The school environment is far different from the home. It is place where we see a conglomeration of all types of attitudes and behaviour. There is no gainsaying that parents have different approaches in raising and disciplining their kids.  Here we dare say that there are two types of parents the “no nonsense” parents and the seemingly “I don’t care parents.” Before coming to an institution like Holy Cross, most children have spent at least the first eleven years of their lives with their parents and under their discipline.  Mindful of the fact that, parents have different approaches in the disciplining of their kids, teachers are faced with children of varying types of behaviour, albeit positive and negative.

It is incumbent on the teachers to help children whose behaviour and attitude leaves much to be desired. At this stage of their growth kids suffer from peer influence and will readily copy what their friends do without giving a thought to the correctness of what they are copying.

Such problems are well addressed in PTA meetings so as to keep the parents aware and so enable them to be vigilant with their kids while they are on holidays. Some kids exhibit tendencies which their parents are not aware of and these are brought to the notices of the parents when parents and teachers meet under the umbrella of a PTA meeting. The fact of having parents assemble as we are doing today is very important because parents also have the opportunity to discuss first hand with teachers on individual and private basis. Parents become aware of certain negative attitudes of their kids known only by the teachers, and this helps the parents to work in correcting such attitudes while the kids are on holidays.

 

SHARING OF IDEAS:

From the above expose, we realize that the PTA meeting is very important as a forum for sharing ideas all geared towards helping our children develop both academic and moral strength and integrity. As parents we want the best for our kids and we want to know and understand the environment in which they learn, the comfort of the environment the facilities made available to achieve a holistic education.

It is a well known and established fact that school environment and regulations have been improved and made more conducive for learning over the years through a great deal of participation and contribution of ideas  from parents.

Parents and teachers have worked together to improve on the living standards of the children, by providing structural facilities, such as good water supply, sports facilities, medical facilities, etc,  which have contributed a great deal in enhancing the living standards of the children, as well as their  condition of health, etc.

 

CONCLUSION:

The more comfortable our children are in schools, the less worrisome we shall be as parents and as the old saying goes more heads are better than one, a PTA is very essential to cater for the needs of our kids to help them perform excellently both academically, morally and spiritually. The PTA is therefore essential to achieve these goals.

 

Author – Maureen Lebong Morfaw.

 

I Will Run For Senatorial Election – Fru Ndi

“Let me break the news here, in Ndu, where the ruthless Biya regime carried out genocide, that I, Fru Ndi, will run for Senate if Biya, together with the SDF, set the rules straight. On two different occasions, I have cautioned Biya that the present councilors’ mandate expired and that they were voted into councils during the NEO and MINAT era, and the results were fraudulent.

As such, he should allow Cameroonians go to the polls this year to, under ELECAM’s biometric registration, vote new Councilors”. This announcement from SDF Chairman, Ni John Fru Ndi, currently touring Cameroon on voter sensitization, was greeted with shouts of joy from SDF militants and sympathisers who gave Fru Ndi a standing ovation.

When Fru Ndi recalled how gendarmes carried out genocide in Ndu in 1992 and forced broken bottles into women genitals, anger was visible on most faces at the rally. Fru Ndi said, after sending MPs and Mayors to Parliament and Councils, he will contest the Senatorial race provided the field is level.

“The politics of Cameroon has been reduced to two parties, the SDF and CPDM. We are going to floor the CPDM, reasons why they want to use the fake figures of past elections, because even with ELECAM, biometric registration is not totally to our taste,” Fru Ndi said. According to Fru Ndi, Biya knows too well that he (Biya) has never defeated him (Fru Ndi) in any elections.

Going by past elections results and vote buying, Fru Ndi regretted that poverty has made some Cameroonians to be very gullible. That is why, according to him, vote buying has landed more than half of Biya’s former cabinet ministers in prison. He said the main message he came with was for all Cameroonians to register their names in the voters’ roll, for them to vote in the upcoming Parliamentary and Municipal elections.

The MP for Ndu Subdivision, Hon. Esther Ngala, thanked the SDF Chieftain for braving the bad roads to Ndu, and used the occasion to enumerate her achievements from the time she entered parliament, ranging from realisation of health, educational and socio-economic projects that, according to her, have changed the lives of her people. Describing Hon. Mrs. Esther Ngala as “the Margaret Thatcher of Ndu”, the SDF District Chairman for Ndu, Eric Ngaba, said Hon Esther Ngala has achieved much in five years as the lone female MP for the SDF.

The District Chairman said the problem of frequent break down of the computerised biometric kits and the shortage of ELECAM staff has greatly slowed down the registration process. He equally complained that “scammers have invaded the political scene”, whom he warned should not dare to disrupt other party activities else they will face the wrath of the SDF.

He said a strike action took place recently in Ndu by a drivers’ trade union that paralyzed Ndu, allegedly masterminded by some CPDM militants. “The strike action of last week that lasted for a week recalls painful memories and reminds us of the taxation drive that was initiated and carried out in 1992 by reckless, repressive forces of Mr. Biya where property was looted and others died in the process in Ndu,” he said.

The SDF District Chairman said Cameroonians should hold Biya to apologise and compensate all Ndu genocide victims, because, to him, the high HIV/AIDS prevalence in the area is as a result of rape on women and girls. In Ako, Mesaje, Tabenken, Mbiame, Nkum and Lus – Nwa, Fru Ndi’s message was “go and register now”. The next lap of the visit will take him to Momo Division, Boyo, Ngoketunjia, Jakin, Oku and Nkor – Noni Subdivisions on February 6.

 

Source: Cameroonpostline

 

Cameroon Is A “French Bilingual Country” – Soule Saidou Nchouat (Senior Translator)

A senior translator, terminologist and researcher at the Yaounde University I, Soule Saidou Nchouat, says Cameroon’s bilingual policy is only based on a constitutional assumption.

He made the remark in an interview with The Post in Yaounde on January 28, as activities marking this year’s national bilingualism day came to a head. According to the translator, the country’s bilingualism is fraught with so many irregularities that Cameroon can only be referred to as “a French bilingual country”. To him, what is referred to as official bilingualism (giving equal status to French and English) is almost in existent.

The French language, he maintained, has been put on a higher pedestal in a way that it is virtually assimilating the English language, as far as official bilingualism is concerned in Cameroon. Further expressing his views, the researcher remarked: “policy is made up of instruments which give orientation to it. Bilingualism is a concept in Cameroon that is based on constitutional assumption.”

Quoting Article 1(3) of the Constitution of Cameroon, he said “English and French shall be the official languages of Cameroon. Both languages,” he stated, “are supposed to have equal status and that Government is charged with the responsibility of ensuring the promotion of bilingualism and its implementation and protection all over the country, as well as national languages.”

The Senior Translator said, so far, the Government has made a good attempt at promoting bilingualism in the country by creating pilot linguistic centers and bilingual Secondary and High Schools all over the country. Nevertheless, he said the implementation of the policy has been a mess.

“For one thing, the constitution does not say how it should be implemented. There is even no text that defines what bilingualism is all about. There is no law prescribing punishment for officials who issue official documents only in one language,” he observed. What obtains now, he went on, is that someone who ignores the other language (English), is not violating any law. Answering a question as to who is a bilingual person in Cameroon, he said anybody who speaks two or more languages is bilingual.

“These languages can be Ejagham, Mungaka, Lamnso and so on,” he said. He said the issue of English and French has to do with official bilingualism.  To him, the problem of bilingualism in Cameroon is further compounded when some officials ignore professional translators and get quacks to translate official documents from French into approximate English.

“Whenever money is concerned, people prefer to bring their relatives (quacks) to do the work of translators,” he said. Soule said some of them have learned to develop linguistic shock absorbers for the ridiculous quality of the English language that they see in some of the billboards in town.

He added that hierarchy does not care about English. As far as unofficial bilingualism is concerned, Soule said the English language was sustaining an assault over French. Citing a recent study, he said a majority of Cameroonians in the Northern Regions who speak both official languages speak 60 percent of English.

He also said many Francophone parents are sending their children to Anglo-Saxon schools to learn English. Official bilingualism in Cameroon, he said, has failed. As a remedy, he said: “we need a law to govern bilingualism in Cameroon and its attendant decrees of application, otherwise, Cameroon will remain a French bilingual country”

Source: Cameroonpostline

Pro-Democracy Cameroonian Activist Urge French President to Advice Biya to Quit Power.

Cameroonian pro-democracy activists in the Diaspora have urged the French President, François Hollande to ask Biya to step down from power after 30 years of reign.

The Association of Democratic and Patriotic Cameroonians in the Diaspora, popularly known by its French acronym as CODE, made the appeal in a strongly worded correspondence sent to President Hollande on January 29. The letter was a somewhat change of strategy by the Cameroonian pro-democracy activists that had earlier planned to receive President Biya with violent demonstrations in Paris last Monday.


President Biya, who is currently on a working visit to France, is being described by the activists as a sit-tight dictator who has stalled democratic transition in Cameroon for three decades by way of election rigging and the sustenance of poor governance characterized by corruption.
The activists forwarded the correspondence to François Hollande ahead of his tête-à-tête with Biya at the Elysée Palace on January 30. In the letter, the activists reminded Hollande that in July 2009, when he was still in the opposition, he accepted to dialogue with them (activists).

CODE holds that Hollande made the promise when they were demonstrating in front of the Bourbon Palace which is the seat of the French National Assembly. They recalled that what fired them into action that day, was the personalisation and the confiscation of power by Biya through electoral fraud. They claimed that they were irked by the upsurge of human rights abuses, corruption, poor governance and the mortgaging of the future of the Cameroonian people.
The letter partly reads, “Conscious of the fact that their future is first of all in their hands, the Cameroonian people are soliciting help from France”. They appealed to Hollande to advise Biya to quit the stage or set new conditions for relations with him. The activists said any further relations between Hollande and Biya must be hinged on prerequisites that border on the organisation of truly democratic elections by a non partisan institution- not ELECAM.

To the activists, the Biya regime should be called upon to respect human rights and fundamental liberties. They hold that the only other option will be for Hollande to advise Biya, 80, to resign after 30 years of misrule at the helm of the state of Cameroon.

Shabby Reception
Meanwhile, Biya and his entourage received a shabby treatment from the French authorities when they touched down at the Orly Airport in Paris last Monday. He was received by very low-profile officials. It was the Cameroonian Ambassador to France, Mbella Mbella Le Jeune and the French Ambassador to Cameroon, Bruno Gain that received President Biya and his delegation. Even the representative of the French President that was sent to receive him, observers hold, is not up to the rank of a Secretary of State.

The press was awash with reports that Biya was received by a Messenger (planton) in France.
Some Cameroonians in France expressed disappointment that it was not only Biya that was disgraced but the entire Cameroonian nation. But the second adviser at the French Embassy in Yaounde has dismissed observations that Biya received a shabby reception in Paris.

The French language daily, Mutations, quoted Laurent Thousard as saying that the kind of reception given Biya at the Orly Airport is equal to the status of his visit. He said the French President would have come out to receive President Biya at the airport if it were an official or State visit. However, political pundits hold that the shabby reception is shows the contempt with which Hollande’s party, the French Socialist, holds Biya.
After meeting with Hollande last Wednesday, President Biya was expected to chair a Franco-Cameroonian business forum on January 31. Both parties were expected to discuss and fine-tune the economic and commercial relations between the two countries. After Nigeria, France is the main source of imports for Cameroon. France equally calls the shots as Cameroon’s colonial master.
France remains one of the main reliable partners giving development aid to Cameroon, especially when it comes to the French Debt Relief and Development Contract, CD2. Huge amounts from this program have been used to realize many development projects in Cameroon.

Amnesty International wants Cameroon to grant Gay Rights.

Amnesty International, AI, has stigmatized Cameroon as a country with a bloody record of human right abuses. This is the byword of the 2012 report the organisation published in January 24.

“People in Cameroon are being subjected to a raft of abuses including unlawful killing and torture as the authorities seek to use the criminal justice system to clamp down on political opponents, human right defenders and journalists and as a weapon to attack lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people,” partly reads the report of the global human rights organisation.

The report documents a series of cases where fear, intimidation and imprisonment have been used to clamp down on political opposition to President Biya. “For example, the case of Titus Edzoa, the former Health Minister who quit government to stand as a Presidential candidate on April 20, 1997. He was later arrested on charges of corruption and he is currently serving a 20-year jail sentence after completing a 15-year prison term,” says the report.

It quotes a melancholy-stricken Edzoa telling AI officials during a visit to his cell in Yaounde that, “I am living in virtual isolation and frightened people will forget me.” AI equally indicts the Cameroon for harassing and threatening human rights defenders and members of their families for doing work and failing to offer them protection.

“Over the years, dozens of prisoners attempting to escape have been shot, injured or killed by guards. Numerous prisoners are held in shackles and many have been detained for more than 20 months without trial,” the report points out. Going by the AI report, its officials visited Kondengui Prison in Yaounde and the Douala New Bell Prison and were appalled by the conditions and ill-treatment. At the time of their latest visit in December 2012, there were more than 7,000 prisoners in two prisons with a capacity of 1500.

“It’s close to a miracle,” the organisation observes, “that people actually survive their stay in prison. I was frightened when I visited.  How worse can it be for the thousands of detainees who are abused and forgotten or ignored by the authorities?” one of the officials quipped.

“Inmates in Kondengui Prison,” says the report, “only eat one meal a day and malnutrition is rife.” Prison authorities informed AI that most of the detainees in one wing are mentally ill and researchers saw male inmates who were completely naked amidst a crowd of fellow prisoners.
Rights Of Homosexuals

The report also observes that “engaging in same sex relations is a criminal offence in Cameroon.”

It, however, gainsaid that the authorities for routine arrest, detention and torture of individual inmates because of their real or perceived sexual orientation. Such violations, it claims, have increased since the mid-2000s. It holds that same sex people in custody are also forced to undergo anal examination in mistaken belief by the authorities that the examinations can prove whether or not people are engaging in same-sex relations.

It says there is no justification, whatsoever, for this illegal, degrading treatment. To them, it represents a severe breach of medical ethics and has to end immediately. The report reveals that defence lawyers for same sex people have recently received death threats against themselves and their children for defending homosexuals.

“Amnesty International submitted a comprehensive memorandum on human right abuses to the Cameroonian Government in September 2012, along with recommendations. When delegates visited the country in December 2012, they concluded that human rights violation has continued unabated since their previous visit in August 2010,” the report narrates.

“It is time to put an end to such blatant violation of human rights. The Government needs to make it clear to security forces that human right violations will not be tolerated; that perpetrators will be brought to justice and reparation paid to victims,” says Godfrey Byaruhanga, AI Central Africa researcher, who visited Cameroon recently.

He further says in the report that, “the Government is adamant that it enforces the rule of law but has little to show for it on the ground. It has to prove it means what it claims.” In reaction, a recent edition of the Government-run bilingual daily, Cameroon Tribune, dismissed the report as false. The paper equally published write-ups that seek to “white-wash” Cameroon’s human rights image.

THE WAR THAT FAILED: The Rise and fall of the mighty UPC [Union des Populations du Cameroun] Part 1

Thus began the bewildering spread of apocalyptic winds of “purification” of society throughout the expanse of Europe with a cold, chilling, iron fist and draconian message from the low lying Karl Marx and Frederick Engels in Marx’s classic,:das kapital”;”A spectre is haunting Europe, the spectre of COMMUNISM.” The very essence of Western Civilization was being put to a hard and destruction laden test. The Bourgeoisie had to go; destroyed and buried forever. The message that grew like a seed planted in the hearts of Marx and Engels bore fruit in London, England where the grave of Marx lies instead of Germany his adorable homeland, Deutschland.
The impending ideas of ideological attacks on the fortress of Europe became a murderous reality in the Russia of the Czars. Successive battles of wills and grabbing of power from the Czars and royalty structured with numerous Counts and Countesses, bourgeoisie,and the middle class finally boiled down to the rise of the proletarians under Lenin. The Union of Soviet Socialist  Republics [USSR] was born. The consolidation was brutal as millions perished. Vladimir Lenin,born in 1870 died in 1924 after leading the revolutions that consequently overthrew the reign of the Czars and ushered in a new concept of an Empire of classless society. The false idea of creating a new Kingdom of God on earth was now taking a structurally veil shape.

Joseph Stalin took over and even went further in his efforts to consolidate his overwhelming powers. He led the USSR in smashing the rise of Hitler and his advancing evil empire. He embarked on a great purge that saw the killings of his countrymen reach the staggering numbers of more than twenty millions people. The scourge of Europe had stated in hellish deed. He did in 1953. He had industrialized the Soviet Union and created political prisons in the Gulag Archipelago.

When Nikita Khrushchev took over the alluring magnetism had started taking hold of many rising intellectuals all over Europe. Paris was the epicenter of discourses, pamphleteer a tradition once dominated by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the advent of the French Revolution. The great World war II had come and gone and leaving many European nations impoverished and a shadow of what mighty powers they were before. The United States of America found herself the most dominant power unscathed from the horrors of the wars that engaged them from European theaters to the diminished Empire of the Sun-god after they had attacked Pearl Harbor on the Roosevelt’s famous day of Infamy in 1941. General Eisenhower was the most powerful man in the world. Africa was on the rise as the few intellectuals groomed in Europe started clamoring for Independence.

In 1956 The English and the french attacked Egypt and reclaimed the Suez Canal from Gamal Abdul Nasser who had overthrown the King. He immediately nationalized the canal in his country but controlled by the English and the French[the French engineer Ferdinand de Lesseps had built the Suez Canal]. President Eisenhower had called on the British and the french to liquidate their Empires, he even told Winston Churchill that though the British thought and declared that their Empire would never perish the peoples in the Empires would answer Patrick Henry’s declaration,”Give me liberty or give me death”…

In the seemingly calmness of the tutorials, conferences, discussions, discourses, exchange of ideas, meetings and the highly effective Socialist International assemblies in Paris a new vision for the creation and independence of African states by Africans was being discerned. Richard Wright, Frantz Fanon, Ho Chi Minh, George Marchais, Francois Mitterrand, Salvatore Allende, Enrico Berlinguer, and many others met for days on end. Young Cameroonian intellectuals joined the fray and became converts to the great fiery ideas of Karl Marx and Lenin. The ideas at hand became ideas of Marxism-Leninism. In time Dr. Felix Moumie and the firebrand, young and powerfully laden with ever flowing ideas of the rising Socialists everywhere, coupled with the thoughts so true of Frantz fannon’s “Wretched of the Earth”, Um Nyobe met several times over many days, weeks and years to form the Union des Populations du Cameroun. Patrice Lumumba had been swept through by Dr.NKrumah’s dream of a United Africa as he declared that the Independence of Ghana will never be complete without the total liberation of Africa. Lumumba then embarked on the total liberation of the Congo from the greedy hands of king Leopold of Belgium and her supporters in the West. Jomo Kenyatta was fighting the British to free Kenya from the shackles of Colonialism while Kaunda was bellowing hard against the British in “Zambia[Southern Rhodesia] Shall be Free”. The Portuguese enclaves of Guinea Bissau, Angola, Mozambique were gathering the storms of rebellion. All Africa was on fire. Algeria was bleeding the French and Ho Chi Minh was waging a war of attrition on the French in Vietnam finally dealt them a death blow in Dien bien phu….another Waterloo and Trafalgar. The British had imprisoned Kwame Nkrumah of the Gold Coast and Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya for their violent activities against the hegemony of her majesty’s Government. The controlled organisation of elections were held and the Prisoners [Nkrumah and the great Jomo] won. At independence the Gold Coast became Ghana.

Ghana became the high point of reference to the parties with socialist leanings all over Africa. Ben Bella of the Algerian Revolutionary Movement was fast becoming a star of liberation movements all over Africa South of the Sahara.

Dr. Felix Moumie with his fearless and brave wife, a Bulu lady, Mme Ekemeyong Marthe, Um Nyobe, Mayi Matip, Ernest Ouandie, and many other young and promising Cameroonian students came together and charted the structural and imminent activities of the Union des Peuples du Cameroun. They requested and got the wholehearted support of the elders of all the other Socialist Movements whose commitment made it possible for Um Nyobe to address the United nations general Assembly. A viable,vibrant,and immensely ideological party was born and ready for action on the operational theaters of Cameroon and her peoples. The list of members included hundreds of surprisingly pro-French Cameroonians. The future of Cameroun had never been brighter with the UPC than it was at the time. Dr.Moumie’s aim of ushering in a Cameroun without the creation of a bourgeoisie class was fast becoming the ultimate lifetime of bliss for him. The wretched of the earth in Cameroun whose lands were being pillaged, exploited, and desecrated had to stop…..and echoing the words of the great American activist, Patrick Henry, “Give me liberty or give me death” he embarked on the next step…the fight to wrest independence from the French.

Banditry-Crimes rituals: 24 suspected criminals behind bars for Ritual Killings in Cameroon 2013.

While investigations continue to incarceration of all other accomplices of the gang, the populations of Mimboman and its surroundings have not hide their relief.
The news of the arrest of alleged perpetrators of a series of ritual murders that have hit the chronic Mimboman neighborhood (and vicinity) to Yaoundé , spread a few days ago, like a wildfire across the Capital City, to the delight of the people who had almost lost sleep. But the day before yesterday morning, in the early hours of the day, Yaoundéens have once again been frightened

Ritual in Cameroon

by rumors of the arrest by the elements of the gendarmerie Nkoabang in a road checkpoint, a lady carrying a bag full of children’s heads. Despite the formal denial of the sub-prefect of the city, and details of the brigade commander who both spoke of false allegations, the spectrum of psychosis hovered throughout the said day in the city.

Fear over the city

This we are told is the reason which would have caused the reaction spokesman Issa Bakary Tchiroma government.
Indeed, according to our sources, the government might well have ignored the case of the arrest of criminals of Mimboman, not to strengthen the sense of fear among the population, but also and especially to not disturb the progress of the investigation.

According to eyewitness accounts, it was after a long investigation by the Commissioner Evina and elements of the 4th district police, supported by the police brigades of research and Emombo Nkolmesseng, the police and security would have fallen on 04 young Cameroonians: 03 men (the age varies between 18 and 23 years) and a girl named Martine, Virginia. At the end of the exploitation of suspects allegedly confessed complete, said forces would after raids, carried out the arrest of 20 other accomplices of the gang, who already meditate their fate to the central prison in Yaoundé, pending trial.

Source: CameroonWebNews