Construction Work Recommences At Limbe Shipyard

Construction work, which had practically been halted at the Limbe Shipyard site, has recommenced.

On Wednesday, March 6, the Minister of Transport, Professor Robert Nkili, was at the site for a brief visit to enable him assess what is currently going on since work on a quay wall began over a month ago. Nkili was received by the Task Force Manager for the site, Beck Baye, who led him round the site in the company of other top officials of the Cameroon Shipyard and Industrial Engineering Company Limited, (Chantier Naval).

At the landward end of the shipyard, bulldozers could be seen leveling the area while trucks ferried away loads of soils. Meantime, at another end, workers in helmets and overalls tinkered away with their tools doing all sorts of engineering work. The construction of the quay wall is being carried out by BAM International, a Dutch company, valued at some 29 million Euros (approximately FCFA 19.022 billion).

The work is expected to be completed by May, 2014. The quay wall will be some 320 metres long with an underwater concrete foundation. In 2007, Interbeton concluded the construction of a 700-meter long break water wall stretching deep into the sea. It was the first major construction works at the shipyard to shield the yard from strong waves where oil rigs could dock and undergo repairs.

The breakwater had been long concluded but the change of command at the helm of Chantier Naval in 2008 where Zaccheus Forjindam was replaced by Antoine Bikoro Alo’o led to one crisis after the other and work on the over FCFA 100-billion project slowed down to a near full stop. Baye Beck told the Minister that there were presently some 81 workers at the site with about eight expatriates to carry on with the quay wall construction. Meantime, Nkili, who began his Southwest visit in Tiko with a stop at the Tiko Port also visited the age-old Tiko Airstrip.

He is said to have noted with dissatisfaction the high level of encroachment on the airport land by people who have built on it. The Minister also visited the Idenau Port on that same Wednesday. On Thursday, he visited the Presbyterian Printing Press which does some major printing work for the Ministry of Transport. He also stopped at the Fako Divisional Delegation of Transport at Down Beach.

His trip in Limbe ended at the Delegation of the Merchant Marine Services where he was presented a plethora of problems plaguing this service. “When you look at those old speedboats there, each time my elements go to the high seas it is as if they are going on a suicide mission,” Jonathan Jikong told the Minister. The merchant marines are supposed to provide maritime security to those who do business by sea as well as carry out checks on the high seas to curb smuggling.

But Jikong told the Minister that his service was almost paralyzed owing to the sheer lack of the necessary equipment to do their work. He told the Minister that they don’t even have an office and are presently being housed in an office at the Down Beach area which he said floods whenever it rains heavily.  Jikong added that they don’t even have a satellite communication network to link up with their elements when they drift far into the high seas.

In addition to the lack of speedboats, no communication links, Jikong said they were more or less left at the mercy of sea pirates. “That is why on most occasions we have to request assistance from the military before we go out,” he said. Minister Nkili instantly invited Jikong to meet him in Yaounde for further discussions.

Source: CPO

In Cameroon, anti-gay voices grow louder.

In Cameroon, the topic of homosexuality is no longer taboo. Both in Yaoundé and Douala, on the street, in taxis, restaurants, bars, offices and markets, on the radio and on television, it is difficult to spend a day or even an hour without the conversation reverting to this topic.

Opposition to homosexuality has become the focus of increasingly frequent conferences, panel discussions, sermons, religious campaigns, and interviews with politicians, bishops and other religious leaders in Cameroon, especially in the Cameroon Tribune, the government’s bilingual daily newspaper.

President Paul Biya suggests that people in Cameroon may be changing their minds about homosexuality, but the most obvious change is the frequency of discussions of the issue.

Increasingly, the issue of homosexuality comes up in day-to-day conversations. Most people agree: “With as much energy has we can muster, in the harshest terms possible, we must condemn this behavior, which is so harmful for Cameroon and its youth.”

Almost everyone “firmly” rejects the practice of homosexuality and its supposed corollaries, pederasty and prostitution, which together are called “deviance,” “moral decadence,” “true aberrations,” “amoral,” “unacceptable,” “satanic,” etc.

Conversations are fueled by the topic of homosexuality at home, in churches and in the press.

Consider how the Cameroon Tribune responded to the Amnesty International’s Jan. 24 report on human rights in Cameroon, which urged the repeal of Cameroonian laws against homosexuality and the release of LGBT prisoners.

For Amnesty International, those actions are a matter of human rights. But many in Cameroon see the issue differently.

Yves Atanga, the Tribune’s editor-in-chief, wrote a front-page article titled “Human rights in Cameroon: Amnesty’s false accusations. (Droits de l’homme au Cameroun: Le faux procès d’Amnesty).”

Editorial writer Makon ma Pondi wrote a column titled “Diversion: An anthem for homosexuals.” They took a stand against Amnesty International, calling it “an advocate of homosexuality” and a “finger-wagger,” and especially against homosexuality, “forbidden by Cameroonian laws.”

In his article, Atanga suggested that “in all honesty,” Amnesty should have entitled its report “Cameroon, leave the gays alone!” Pondi’s column complained about an “insidious and relentless campaign orchestrated for months through the media, seeking the repeal of the law [prohibiting sexual relations between persons of the same sex], to be achieved by any means necessary, including diplomatic pressure or withholding foreign aid.” The column asks, “Are we to believe that if we allow homosexuality and same-sex marriage we will achieve the economic growth we seek?”

Bishops say no, no, no!

Bishops of the Roman Catholic Church united in their opposition to homosexuality on Jan. 12 at the 36th annual gathering in Sangmelima of the National Episcopal Conference of Cameroon. In a statement published in its entirety on Feb. 7 in the Cameroon Tribune and later in other newspapers, they denounced homosexuality in strong terms.

They opposed “the multifaceted claims of human rights made by promoters of homosexuality — the right to marriage, to adopt children. to establish a family, to procreation with medical assistance, etc. — claims that are based on several concepts whose main ideology of gender … is opposed to classical ideas of family, gender and reproductive health.”

The bishops ignored examples of traditional African acceptance of same-sex relations. (See, for example, the article “What traditional African homosexuality learned from the West.”)

The bishops unanimously declared that homosexuality “falsifies human anthropology and trivializes sexuality, marriage and family as the foundation of society. In African culture, it is not part of the family and social values. It is a flagrant violation of the legacy left to use by our ancestors, who were faithful to heterosexuality and the family. In human history, homosexual practices have never led to societal evolution but have always been clear signs of civilization’s decay. In fact, homosexuality opposes humanity and destroys it.”

They urged “all believers and people of good will to reject homosexuality and so-called ‘gay marriage’ to pray for homosexuals and those who are inclined toward homosexuality, watching over them and seeking compassionately to convert them.”

Even before their statement was published, Mgr. Victor Tonye Bakot, the archbishop of Yaoundé and a fervent fighter against homosexuality, said in a Jan. 28 interview: “We do not want” homosexuality in Africa.

“The West has its culture and Africans have ours,” he said. “Since we must respect the parallels between the two cultures, and since we are in dialogue with each other, let us propose polygamy to the West just as they propose homosexuality to us. Otherwise, let each of us remain set in their own culture.”

“I reject this new attempt at colonialization. They’re going too far,” he said.

On Feb. 24, the Association of Catholic Jurists of Cameroon condemned homosexuality during a meeting in Douala with Samuel Kléda, archbishop of Douala.

Unnatural?

Although homosexual behavior has been observed in hundreds of species of animals, many people in Cameroon believe otherwise.

For example, in Archbishop Bakot’s sermons in the cathedral in Yaoundé and elsewhere, he condemned homosexuality as an “unnatural practice.”

In addition, attorney Pierre Robert Fojou told journalist Armand Essogo “not only is homosexuality punishable under Article 347 of the Cameroonian Penal Code, but it is also rejected by Cameroonians in general who, as good Africans, consider sexual relations between persons of the same sex against nature. “

Nico Halle preaching to the governor

“This is not negotiable,” stated the Christian Men’s Fellowship of the Presbyterian Church in Cameroon, as it launched a February campaign against homosexuality in the southwestern part of the country. “God made man and woman; animals, he made male and female. It is unacceptable that a man fall in love with another man, which is worse than animals, because animals only make love with the opposite sex. I’ve never seen a hen have sex with another hen, or two female dogs, or two male dogs. The rooster goes with the chicken, and so on. So, if the man will do what even the animal does not, then man becomes worse than an animal. … It is satanic,” reported the newspaper La Nouvelle Expression in an article on Feb. 27 headlined “Southwest: Crusade against homosexuality.”

Tumfor Nico Halle, a lawyer who is president of the Christian Men’s Fellowship of Cameroon, argued that “not only does our penal code condemn homosexuality with Article 347 providing for imprisonment of up to five years, but the Bible is also even harder on it. Leviticus 20 verse 13 says that if a man lie with a man as one lies with a woman, it is an abomination. They shall surely be put to death: their blood will be on them.”

Bernard Okalia Bilai, governor of the Southwest region, agreed with those statements, adding that “as a practicing Christian, he would not allow homosexuality in his region by any means.”

He accused human rights attorney Alice Nkom not only of repeatedly supporting the “homosexual cause” but also of being corrupt. He claimed that, when he was a prefect in Wouri, she urged him to release a homosexual defendant, saying that “a lot of euros are at stake.” Nkom has not yet responded to a request for comment on this accusation.

Rejection of ‘anus-ocracy’

Similar discussions fill the air waves. All day long the radio hosts of FM Yaoundé and their listeners decry the “immorality” of homosexuality. Cameroon Radio and Television (CRTV), the national public television channel, focuses on the subject through debates, documentaries, short films (sometimes made by Cameroonians and other Africans who “reject this practice from the West”) and even in entertainment programs.

The best known of these programs is undoubtedly the show “Delire,” in which the now-graying master of ceremonies, Foly Dirane (the stage name of Adrian Tafen Veyreton), has not let a single show go by in over 20 years without warning youths aged 10 to 25 to watch out for homosexuals.

He boasts that in his 2001 song “Les Mouches,” he became the first singer to denounce homosexuality.

Although many LGBT people in Cameroon live in poverty — fired from their jobs and rejected by their families when their sexual preference becomes known — a widespread belief persists in Cameroon that homosexuals are rich, powerful and evil, even practicing black magic.

Foly Dirane claims that homosexuals are “sectarian pederasts who use money and employment as a bait to lure youths into their traps. By sodomizing their victims, they steal the youths’ power and good fortune,” he says.

“Homosexuality in Cameroon is not like homosexuality in Europe,” he says.

In Cameroon, homosexuals seek to impose an “anus-ocracy,” he says. “Homosexuality is a cult of pederasts who feed on youth.”

This cult’s sorcerers demand homosexuality as a condition sine qua non for young people to succeed in society, he says.

“The cult has chosen homosexuality as a means of domination,” he says. “This sect has money and power and wants to force all young Cameroonians to join them.”

“People without power are propelled into positions of great responsibility through their anus,” he claims.

With statements like those, it’s clear that the “debate” about homosexuality in Cameroon is far from over.

Source: 76Crimes

 

Prime Minister Philemon Yang Wants Insurance Coverage Extended To Underprivileged

If insurance companies hearken to the request of Prime Minister Philemon Yang, insurance coverage will no longer be only for the well-to-do. On February 25, the Prime Minister urged heads of insurance companies in Africa and experts from related organisations to pay greater attention to vulnerable people.

Yang made the request in Yaounde while chairing the 37th Annual General Assembly meeting of Federation of Insurance Companies in Africa, FANAF. The meeting, attended by some 600 delegates from 43 countries, was organised under the theme “Insurance and Social Risks”. He talked about measures by Cameroon to respond to disasters and accidents; prevention and sensitization on insurance.

Meanwhile, the President of FANAF, Protais Ayangma, said focus was on social risks and compensations in the sector such as health for all, accidents and compensation.

“Each time we meet, we challenge members to do well to pay claims of victims, which is our major role,” he said. He highlighted the role of the Conference of Inter- African Insurance Markets (CIMA), which is empowered to withdraw licenses from unprofessional insurance companies.

Ayangma said they intend to market the insurance sector and assure the public that insurance companies should be trusted in handling issues relating to risks. The President of the Insurance Association of Cameroon, Martin Foncha, said Cameroon was no longer satisfied with the second position it occupied in the insurance market within the area covered by CIMA. He said their target is to grab the first position from Ivory Coast.

For four days, insurance experts exchanged ideas on the challenges and opportunities for the development of an enterprise in Africa, the evolution of investment in Africa, societal responsibilities of insurance companies, coverage of natural disasters and mechanisms for the universal medical coverage. In Cameroon, medical insurance remains a luxury, as only few enterprises offer this benefit to their employees. Statistics from the Ministry Public Health show that malaria alone grabs 40 percent of the family income of Cameroonians.

During the FANAF gathering all member countries expressed the same experience, justifying why participants centered discussions on the vital role that health insurance could play in the social protection of Africans. The Federation’s President, Ayangma recommended a public- private partnership in the member countries of FANAF in order to enhance a universal medical insurance.

He called on participants to draw inspiration from Tunisia and Rwanda, which according to him have succeeded to protect their populations through this policy. Ayangma also hinted that plans were underway to implement the automobile guarantee fund in member countries to optimize and accelerate procedures put in place for road accident victims.

Source: CPO

 

UPC Leaders Arrested For Protesting Against ELECAM

Gendarmes February 26, at Rond Point Deido, Douala, broke up a peaceful demonstration by the UPC Mack-Kit against ELECAM and arrested its President and Secretary General.

The gendarmes, who claimed that the protest demonstration was illegal, arrested the President of UPC Mack-Kit, Alexis Same Ndema. But the leadership of the UPC faction insisted that the protest demonstration was not illegal. They explained that the party duly deposited a declaration to organise the peaceful demonstration with the DO of Douala I, Jean-Marie Mbarga Ekoa.

They presented a copy of the declaration to the gendarmes. They also quoted the DO to have cautioned them to ensure that the demonstration took place peacefully. But the gendarmes would not let go the two senior officials of the party and whisked them off into detention at the Bonanjo Gendarmerie Brigade, which is now located in the former office of the defunct REGIFERCAM at the entrance to Bonanjo.

When The Post contacted the National Secretary for Communication of UPC Mack-Kit, Hilaire Ham Ekoue, at 8.30 am on February 27, he said the National President and Secretary General were still in detention. UPC Mack-Kit staged the protest demonstration close to a stand that had been set up by ELECAM at Rond Point Deido to facilitate voter registration. Some of the militants carried placards, while some were busy distributing tracts containing a six-point demand by the party.

The demonstrators denounced ELECAM for not being an independent body. They said that ELECAM is at the service of the ruling CPDM, insisting that Cameroon needs an Independent Electoral Commission to be able to conduct transparent, free and fair elections. The UPC Mack-Kit militants also strongly criticised ELECAM for not having as yet distributed voters’ cards to Cameroonians who had since registered. They saw the long delay as another manipulation by ELECAM to rig the up-coming Legislative and Municipal Elections in favour of the CPDM.

The UPC militants asserted that with biometric registration, cards are normally supposed to be issued to voters immediately they register. The party militants also insisted that considering the population of Cameroon, ELECAM is supposed to target some 12 million Cameroonians for voter registration, and not the low figure of seven million currently set by the institution as the target.

The six points contained in the tracts which the UPC militants distributed were some of the demands or proposals that the party has been putting out for some two years now, for the reform of the Electoral Law. UPC Mack-Kit, among other things, wants the voting age to be reduced to 18 years as well as a two-round presidential election.

Source: CPO

 

Biya Takes Nation By Storm: Announces Senatorial Elections For April 14

Against popular expectations, President Biya has billed senatorial elections for Sunday, April 14. Biya made the announcement in a Presidential decree that was broadcast on State radio on Wednesday, February 27. Biya surprised the nation by deciding to organize senatorial elections before municipal elections.

He also made nonsense of the appeal of the leading opposition Chieftain, SDF Chairman, John Fru Ndi, that it was logical for municipal and parliamentary elections to be organised first.

The announcement means that the ruling party will carry the day since the Electoral College for the senatorial election is made up of councilors. In the 2007 council elections, the CPDM emerged with a controversial majority of councils following reports that the polls were heavily rigged.

The news of the election was broken after Prime Minister, Philemon Yang, had convened Fru Ndi and some other political leaders to give them the information before it could be announced.

But Fru Ndi told journalists at his Yaounde Omnisport residence that the Prime Minister did not have the opportunity to break the scoop to them given that before they arrived at the Star Building, the State radio had already broken the news. He said, while traveling from Bamenda Wednesday morning, he delayed at Obala because he was involved in an accident.

Fru Ndi said a motorcyclist who was carrying one person suddenly bumped into his car. The motorcyclist and his passenger died on the spot, Fru Ndi narrated. “That is what delayed me and before I went to the Prime Minister’s Office, the radio had broken the news,” he said. Reacting to the convening of the electorate, Fru Ndi still repeated what he had said several times before: “The SDF will not allow senatorial elections to hold before municipal elections.”

He said if senatorial elections are predicated on the present councilors whose mandate had long expired, it will not have any iota of legitimacy. To him, the 2007 municipal elections were heavily rigged in favour of the ruling CPDM party. He said all the stakeholders were unanimous that the election which was organised by the defunct National Elections Observatory, NEO, was a total mess.

To Fru Ndi, even President Biya, in tandem, with all other stakeholders admitted that the 2007 polls were heavily flawed. Fru Ndi warned that the senatorial elections will not be organised in the present situation if Biya does not sit down with him to explain on what logic he convened the electorate under such messy conditions.

Asked what he would do if Biya ignores his threats, Fru Ndi retorted: “I and SDF militants will sharpen our machetes and come out for a full-blown onslaught to stop the election.”  Fru Ndi said, while he was looking for every means for Cameroon to remain peaceful, Biya was instead looking for all avenues to provoke a civil war.

He warned that by convening the electorate for senatorial elections against popular opinion that municipal elections be organised first, Biya was pushing Cameroonians to the wall. With their backs on the wall, they will be forced to fight back, he said. Meanwhile, the councilors that make up the Electoral College for the elections are predominantly CPDM. Following the current dispensation, only a few parties would be involved in the senatorial elections.

The ruling CPDM party has 300 out of 360 councils. The opposition parties have 60 as follows: the Social Democratic Front, SDF- 18, the National Union for Democracy and Progress, NUDP-11 and shares some 9 councils with the CPDM, the Cameroon Democratic Union- 8, the Movement for the Defense of the Republic MDR- 5, the Union des Population du Cameroun, UPC- 2 councils and others.

Although there are conflicting statistics as to the number of councils that each party won in 2007, it is clear that the CPDM has some 10,632 councilors while the SDF has 801. NUDP of Bello Bouba Maigari has 389 councilors. From this premise, it is clear that the CPDM will have an overwhelming majority in the Upper House of Parliament.

According to varsity don and political scientist, Dr. Mathias Owona Nguini, it will be the worst thing to happen because the present councilors were elected in the 2007 municipal elections that were heavily flawed. The election, he said, was fraught with irregularities and widespread rigging in favour of the ruling CPDM. It was due to such rigging that the Supreme Court ordered for a rerun of the polls in certain areas.

One of the areas where a rerun took place was the Lobo Council in the Lekie Division of the Centre Region. Partial elections were equally organised in Douala II, Bafang, Mogode, Matomb, Pette and Mesondo councils. Due to its sophisticated rigging machinery, CPDM still carried the day at the end of the exercise. There is evidence that the opposition parties going in for the race will face a crushing defeat from the CPDM.

For one thing, the law governing the organisation of senatorial elections empowers the President of the Republic to appoint 30 percent of the senators. This means that Biya will appoint 30 out of the 100 senators that will make up the Upper House of Parliament as provided for by the 1996 constitution.

By virtue of last Wednesday’s Presidential decree, campaigns for the senatorial elections will begin on March 30. Candidates for the election have to pay a caution fee of FCFA one million.  According to another Presidential decree, each member of the electorate will be paid FCFA 50,000 allowance on Election Day.

Souce: CPO

Southern Cameroons Urges Nigeria To Take Case To UN

The Nigerian Government has been given a 30-day ultimatum to respect an Abuja High Court judgement on the restoration of Southern Cameroons statehood with the United Nations, UN.

The peoples of the Southern Cameroons have, through their Counsel, Okoi Obono-Obia, written a letter to the Attorney General of Nigeria and Minister of Justice, Mohamed Bello Adoke (SAN), urging the Federal Government to immediately comply with the Consent Judgement in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/30/2002, dated March 25, 2002.

The judgement was delivered by the former Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Hon. Justice Rosaline Ukeje, which is in their favour. The Consent Order directed the Federal Republic of Nigeria to take any measures as may be necessary to place the case of the peoples of the geographical entity known as at October 1, 1960, as Southern Cameroons, for self-determination before the UN General Assembly and any other relevant international organisation.

The letter, dated January 27, 2013, was served on the Attorney General on February 8, 2013, urged the Federal Government of Nigeria, in the spirit and adherence to the Rule of Law and Constitutionalism, especially the authority and integrity of the judicial branch of the of Government, to take immediate steps to ensure compliance by the Federal Government of Nigeria with the terms/directives in the said Consent Judgement/ Order.

Accordingly, the Federal Government of Nigeria was given an ultimatum of 30 days from the date of the receipt of the letter to take steps to ensure compliance with the said Consent Judgement/Order; failure of which they will instruct their Counsel to institute proceedings to compel the Federal Government of Nigeria to comply with the said Consent Judgement/Order. The Federal Government, theretofore, has until March 10, to comply.

The peoples of Southern Cameroons represented by Dr. Kevin Ngwang Ngumni, Augustine Feh Ndangam, Chief Ette Otun Ayamba, Professor Victor Mukwele, Dr. Martin Ngeka, Nfor Ngala Nfor, Hitler Mbinglo, Henry Dobgima K Mundam, Simon Ninpa, Shey Tafon, Paul Yiwir, and Isaac Sona had sued the Federal Government of Nigeria in the Federal High Court, Abuja, by Originating Summons seeking determination of the following questions:

Whether the Union envisaged  under the Southern Cameroons Plebiscite in 1961 between La République du Cameroun and Southern Cameroons legally took effect as contemplated by the relevant United Nations Resolutions, particularly the United Nations Resolution 1352 (XIV) of October 16, 1959 and United Nations Trusteeship Council Resolution 2013 (XXIV) of May 31, 1960?

Whether the termination by the Government of the United Kingdom of its Trusteeship over the Southern Cameroons on September 30, 1961, without ensuring prior Implementation of the Constitutional arrangements under which the Southern Cameroons and La République du Cameroun were to unite as one Federal State was not in breach of Articles 3 and 6 of the Trusteeship Agreement for the territory of the Cameroons under British Administration approved General Assembly of the United Nations on December 13, 1946, the United Nations General Assembly Resolutions 1352 of October 16, 1959 ; 1608 of April 2, 1961, the United Nations Trusteeship Council Resolution 2013 (XIV) of May 31, 1960 and Article 76 (b) of the Charter of the United Nations?

Was the Assumption of Sovereign Powers on October 1 1961 and the continued exercise of same by the Government of La République du Cameroun over the Southern Cameroons after the termination by the Government of the United Kingdom or its Trusteeship over the territory legal and valid when the Union between Southern Cameroons and La République du Cameroun contemplated by the Southern Cameroons Plebiscite 1961 had not legally taken effect?

Whether the peoples of Southern Cameroons are not entitled to self-determination within their clearly defined territory separate from La République du Cameroun? Whether it is the Southern Cameroons and not La République du Cameroun that shares a maritime boundary with the Federal Republic of Nigeria?

However, the Federal Government of Nigeria sued for a settlement of the case out of court which led to the delivery of the Consent Judgment dated March 25, 2002, based on the agreement reached by the parties. Today, almost 11 years after, the peoples of Southern Cameroons want the Federal Government of Nigeria to comply with the Consent Judgement/Order.
Bakassi Returnees Sue Federal Gov’t

In a related story, the Daily Independent recently posted a case in which returnees of the Uruan Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State extraction have sued the Federal Government of Nigeria before an Abuja High Court, claiming 30 billion Naira as damages over alleged acts of betrayal, leading to the loss of their ancestral home at the Bakassi Peninsula to Cameroon.

“In a writ of summons and statement of claim filed through their counsel, Ukeme Ekpenyong, the plaintiffs include Augustine Bassey Efiong, Sila Clement Etim, Efiong Bassey Ekanen and Imaobong Edem Efiong (suing for themselves and on behalf of Bakassi Returnees of Uruan Local Government Area Extraction),” reports the Daily Independent article signed by Joe Nwankwo in Abuja and Bassey Inyang in Calabar.

Vox pop: Must Biya Hide His Buea Visit Date?

Several Cameroonians were interviewed and below are their individual opinions on Biya’s ‘Visit’ to Buea.

1. He Is Not Ready.

Biya is the Head of State and has the Cameroon programme in hand and so doesn’t need to give an account of his departure to anyone if he doesn’t deem it fit. If he hasn’t said anything about the date, then it could be that he is not ready and in such a case, he cannot give any precise date because he doesn’t want to disappoint the people again.

Sama, Administrator, Yaounde.

2. Biya Should Give A Specific Date.

I think the President should be able to give a specific date to enable the population to properly mobilise for his coming. We know that, as the supreme head of the country, he has the right to visit any region at any time without even seeking the opinions of the locals.

But with the destruction and frequent clean-up campaigns instituted by the council under the guise of presidential visit, which date is unknown, is greatly affecting not only businesses but also the inhabitants of Buea. For how long are we going to carry on with this activity?

Kenneth Ndze, Businessman, Buea.

3. Biya Is Scared.

Biya is scared. The Southern Cameroons issue has existed for long now and the people have a grudge, and this worsened when he didn’t keep to his promise of visiting the Southwest. I even heard the people once promised to burn him to death. This has scared him and even if he announces a date for his trip to Buea it is likely that he will send a representative. I think Biya is just deceiving the people just like before. He won’t go to Buea.

Kelly, Barber, Yaounde.

4. The President Is Not Supposed To Unveil Date.

Under normal circumstances, the President is not supposed to unveil the date of his visit for security reasons. We know that such a high profile personality like the President needs maximum protection, especially on very special State visits like the one he is about to make to Buea. When he must have been sure that the security network in Buea is in place, he can then give an exact date. Also, the President’s schedule is so tight that he needs time to actually give a date that will not clash with his personal programme.

Aaron Prosper Bias, Accountant, Buea.

5. Biya’s Visits Have Often Been A Mystery.

President Biya’s visits have always been a mystery. He has never disclosed his working or visiting calendar as most of his moves are usually a surprise to the citizens. I think this is not good when it comes to issues of the State.

He has ideas of what needs to be done but I suspect that the resources to get such wishes come to reality are not properly managed. His collaborators are not helping him especially in the work they need to do ahead of his visit to Buea. I wish he announces the visit to Buea for May 20, 2013, because that town is also part of Cameroon.

Rev. Richard Ngassa Kessou, Yaounde.

6. The President Isn’t Hiding Date.

I think the President is not hiding the date of his visit to Buea because he was supposed to have visited Buea since last year. But it seems as if the people he assigned to prepare the necessary logistics for his visit are not ready. Until Buea is ready to host the President before he will make public the date.

Eno Tanyi, Teacher, GTHS Buea.

7. The Secrecy Is Out Of Fear Or Contempt.

If Biya’s visit is shrouded in much secrecy, it could be out of two things; fear or contempt or simply the two. Biya promised the people earlier of his visit but never honoured his promise, and just like the other time he fears something might go wrong. Secondly, Biya might just despise the people of the Region and decide not to visit them at all.

Augustine Meh Zang, Director, Computer Institute, Yaounde.

8. He Wants To Get Things Ready.

I think he doesn’t want to be embarrassed because he has compared the level of the work done on the ground.  Drawing lessons from what happened in the past, because you will recall that some time ago, he was told all was ready and he announced elections only to discover on election day that not everything was in place.

He was forced to postpone the elections. This is on account that he has given assignments to be done and he is monitoring the level of work and if it is not satisfactory, he would not announce the date.

Choves Loh, Regional Chief Cameroon Tribune, NW.

9. Only He And God Know What He Is Afraid Of.

Which date has Biya ever announced? Not even the date of Cameroon football finals are ever known ahead of time. It is announced a few hours to the day. Only he and God know what he is afraid of. This is one more proof if you needed any that his is a government by improvisation. We are used to it, but I think it is high time we got out of this mess.

Wilfred Tassang, Moderator Club2020, Bamenda.

10. Biya Knows What State Secrets Are.

I am very convinced that President Biya knows what State secrets are and until everything is in place his date to Buea remains a secret.

Tamnjong N., Chief of Personnel, Basic Education, Northwest.

11. Biya Is Unsure Of Event.

I am sure that the Head of State is not yet certain that the event will hold and as such no need announcing the date.

Christopher Akunchum, Carpenter, Mbingo.

12. Many Things Must Be Put In Place.

I do not think that President Biya is actually hiding his date of visit to Buea. Before coming to Buea, so many things must be put in place like the roads, hotels, and other infrastructural logistics. Until these factors are put in place he cannot actually give a date for his visit.

John Tendong Esegemu, Consultant, Buea.

13. Biya Needs Rest Like Pope Benedict XVI.

It is not a normal thing and some people may argue that the date is kept secret for security reasons. But Biya is seemingly afraid to move even within his own country. I have the feeling that he feels more at ease out of Cameroon than when he is here. If the date of the visit is announced well ahead of time, the committee members preparing for the visit will work better while contractors working on the development projects will be forced to also work within the time frame

By the way, development projects are supposed to be implemented across the country irrespective of the fact that Biya is visiting an area or not. I can tell you that many people are no longer interested in the visit because of the procrastinations. I think the President needs a deserved rest after working for all this while just like Pope Benedict XVI has done.

Mercy Bilem, Yaounde.

14. He Should Announce The Date.

I am disappointed with him for continuously hiding his visit to Buea. He should announce the date so that the population should prepare to welcome him.  If you are the President for the people, elected by the people, you must not hide your visit. When we have an august guest, we must prepare for his visit.

Gwendoline Manka, Journalist Hot Cocoa, Bamenda.

15. Authorities Should Conceal Date.

Many people are anxious to know when the Head of State will be coming to Buea. But it is appropriate for the authorities to conceal the date for security reasons. Knowing how the society is; the President may not tell the people when he will actually come. But he can give them a period say three months or five months, but to give them the exact date will not be possible, for security reasons.

Alfred Meende, Civil Servant, Buea.